summaryrefslogtreecommitdiff
path: root/test/descidx1.test
diff options
context:
space:
mode:
Diffstat (limited to 'test/descidx1.test')
-rw-r--r--test/descidx1.test364
1 files changed, 364 insertions, 0 deletions
diff --git a/test/descidx1.test b/test/descidx1.test
new file mode 100644
index 0000000..c7fab34
--- /dev/null
+++ b/test/descidx1.test
@@ -0,0 +1,364 @@
+# 2005 December 21
+#
+# The author disclaims copyright to this source code. In place of
+# a legal notice, here is a blessing:
+#
+# May you do good and not evil.
+# May you find forgiveness for yourself and forgive others.
+# May you share freely, never taking more than you give.
+#
+#*************************************************************************
+# This file implements regression tests for SQLite library. The
+# focus of this script is descending indices.
+#
+# $Id: descidx1.test,v 1.10 2008/03/19 00:21:31 drh Exp $
+#
+
+set testdir [file dirname $argv0]
+source $testdir/tester.tcl
+
+# Do not use a codec for tests in this file, as the database file is
+# manipulated directly using tcl scripts (using the [hexio_write] command).
+#
+do_not_use_codec
+
+db eval {PRAGMA legacy_file_format=OFF}
+
+# This procedure sets the value of the file-format in file 'test.db'
+# to $newval. Also, the schema cookie is incremented.
+#
+proc set_file_format {newval} {
+ hexio_write test.db 44 [hexio_render_int32 $newval]
+ set schemacookie [hexio_get_int [hexio_read test.db 40 4]]
+ incr schemacookie
+ hexio_write test.db 40 [hexio_render_int32 $schemacookie]
+ return {}
+}
+
+# This procedure returns the value of the file-format in file 'test.db'.
+#
+proc get_file_format {{fname test.db}} {
+ return [hexio_get_int [hexio_read $fname 44 4]]
+}
+
+
+# Verify that the file format starts as 4.
+#
+do_test descidx1-1.1 {
+ execsql {
+ CREATE TABLE t1(a,b);
+ CREATE INDEX i1 ON t1(b ASC);
+ }
+ get_file_format
+} {4}
+do_test descidx1-1.2 {
+ execsql {
+ CREATE INDEX i2 ON t1(a DESC);
+ }
+ get_file_format
+} {4}
+
+# Put some information in the table and verify that the descending
+# index actually works.
+#
+do_test descidx1-2.1 {
+ execsql {
+ INSERT INTO t1 VALUES(1,1);
+ INSERT INTO t1 VALUES(2,2);
+ INSERT INTO t1 SELECT a+2, a+2 FROM t1;
+ INSERT INTO t1 SELECT a+4, a+4 FROM t1;
+ SELECT b FROM t1 WHERE a>3 AND a<7;
+ }
+} {6 5 4}
+do_test descidx1-2.2 {
+ execsql {
+ SELECT a FROM t1 WHERE b>3 AND b<7;
+ }
+} {4 5 6}
+do_test descidx1-2.3 {
+ execsql {
+ SELECT b FROM t1 WHERE a>=3 AND a<7;
+ }
+} {6 5 4 3}
+do_test descidx1-2.4 {
+ execsql {
+ SELECT b FROM t1 WHERE a>3 AND a<=7;
+ }
+} {7 6 5 4}
+do_test descidx1-2.5 {
+ execsql {
+ SELECT b FROM t1 WHERE a>=3 AND a<=7;
+ }
+} {7 6 5 4 3}
+do_test descidx1-2.6 {
+ execsql {
+ SELECT a FROM t1 WHERE b>=3 AND b<=7;
+ }
+} {3 4 5 6 7}
+
+# This procedure executes the SQL. Then it checks to see if the OP_Sort
+# opcode was executed. If an OP_Sort did occur, then "sort" is appended
+# to the result. If no OP_Sort happened, then "nosort" is appended.
+#
+# This procedure is used to check to make sure sorting is or is not
+# occurring as expected.
+#
+proc cksort {sql} {
+ set ::sqlite_sort_count 0
+ set data [execsql $sql]
+ if {$::sqlite_sort_count} {set x sort} {set x nosort}
+ lappend data $x
+ return $data
+}
+
+# Test sorting using a descending index.
+#
+do_test descidx1-3.1 {
+ cksort {SELECT a FROM t1 ORDER BY a}
+} {1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 nosort}
+do_test descidx1-3.2 {
+ cksort {SELECT a FROM t1 ORDER BY a ASC}
+} {1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 nosort}
+do_test descidx1-3.3 {
+ cksort {SELECT a FROM t1 ORDER BY a DESC}
+} {8 7 6 5 4 3 2 1 nosort}
+do_test descidx1-3.4 {
+ cksort {SELECT b FROM t1 ORDER BY a}
+} {1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 nosort}
+do_test descidx1-3.5 {
+ cksort {SELECT b FROM t1 ORDER BY a ASC}
+} {1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 nosort}
+do_test descidx1-3.6 {
+ cksort {SELECT b FROM t1 ORDER BY a DESC}
+} {8 7 6 5 4 3 2 1 nosort}
+do_test descidx1-3.7 {
+ cksort {SELECT a FROM t1 ORDER BY b}
+} {1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 nosort}
+do_test descidx1-3.8 {
+ cksort {SELECT a FROM t1 ORDER BY b ASC}
+} {1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 nosort}
+do_test descidx1-3.9 {
+ cksort {SELECT a FROM t1 ORDER BY b DESC}
+} {8 7 6 5 4 3 2 1 nosort}
+do_test descidx1-3.10 {
+ cksort {SELECT b FROM t1 ORDER BY b}
+} {1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 nosort}
+do_test descidx1-3.11 {
+ cksort {SELECT b FROM t1 ORDER BY b ASC}
+} {1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 nosort}
+do_test descidx1-3.12 {
+ cksort {SELECT b FROM t1 ORDER BY b DESC}
+} {8 7 6 5 4 3 2 1 nosort}
+
+do_test descidx1-3.21 {
+ cksort {SELECT a FROM t1 WHERE a>3 AND a<8 ORDER BY a}
+} {4 5 6 7 nosort}
+do_test descidx1-3.22 {
+ cksort {SELECT a FROM t1 WHERE a>3 AND a<8 ORDER BY a ASC}
+} {4 5 6 7 nosort}
+do_test descidx1-3.23 {
+ cksort {SELECT a FROM t1 WHERE a>3 AND a<8 ORDER BY a DESC}
+} {7 6 5 4 nosort}
+do_test descidx1-3.24 {
+ cksort {SELECT b FROM t1 WHERE a>3 AND a<8 ORDER BY a}
+} {4 5 6 7 nosort}
+do_test descidx1-3.25 {
+ cksort {SELECT b FROM t1 WHERE a>3 AND a<8 ORDER BY a ASC}
+} {4 5 6 7 nosort}
+do_test descidx1-3.26 {
+ cksort {SELECT b FROM t1 WHERE a>3 AND a<8 ORDER BY a DESC}
+} {7 6 5 4 nosort}
+
+# Create a table with indices that are descending on some terms and
+# ascending on others.
+#
+ifcapable bloblit {
+ do_test descidx1-4.1 {
+ execsql {
+ CREATE TABLE t2(a INT, b TEXT, c BLOB, d REAL);
+ CREATE INDEX i3 ON t2(a ASC, b DESC, c ASC);
+ CREATE INDEX i4 ON t2(b DESC, a ASC, d DESC);
+ INSERT INTO t2 VALUES(1,'one',x'31',1.0);
+ INSERT INTO t2 VALUES(2,'two',x'3232',2.0);
+ INSERT INTO t2 VALUES(3,'three',x'333333',3.0);
+ INSERT INTO t2 VALUES(4,'four',x'34343434',4.0);
+ INSERT INTO t2 VALUES(5,'five',x'3535353535',5.0);
+ INSERT INTO t2 VALUES(6,'six',x'363636363636',6.0);
+ INSERT INTO t2 VALUES(2,'two',x'323232',2.1);
+ INSERT INTO t2 VALUES(2,'zwei',x'3232',2.2);
+ INSERT INTO t2 VALUES(2,NULL,NULL,2.3);
+ SELECT count(*) FROM t2;
+ }
+ } {9}
+ do_test descidx1-4.2 {
+ execsql {
+ SELECT d FROM t2 ORDER BY a;
+ }
+ } {1.0 2.2 2.0 2.1 2.3 3.0 4.0 5.0 6.0}
+ do_test descidx1-4.3 {
+ execsql {
+ SELECT d FROM t2 WHERE a>=2;
+ }
+ } {2.2 2.0 2.1 2.3 3.0 4.0 5.0 6.0}
+ do_test descidx1-4.4 {
+ execsql {
+ SELECT d FROM t2 WHERE a>2;
+ }
+ } {3.0 4.0 5.0 6.0}
+ do_test descidx1-4.5 {
+ execsql {
+ SELECT d FROM t2 WHERE a=2 AND b>'two';
+ }
+ } {2.2}
+ do_test descidx1-4.6 {
+ execsql {
+ SELECT d FROM t2 WHERE a=2 AND b>='two';
+ }
+ } {2.2 2.0 2.1}
+ do_test descidx1-4.7 {
+ execsql {
+ SELECT d FROM t2 WHERE a=2 AND b<'two';
+ }
+ } {}
+ do_test descidx1-4.8 {
+ execsql {
+ SELECT d FROM t2 WHERE a=2 AND b<='two';
+ }
+ } {2.0 2.1}
+}
+
+do_test descidx1-5.1 {
+ execsql {
+ CREATE TABLE t3(a,b,c,d);
+ CREATE INDEX t3i1 ON t3(a DESC, b ASC, c DESC, d ASC);
+ INSERT INTO t3 VALUES(0,0,0,0);
+ INSERT INTO t3 VALUES(0,0,0,1);
+ INSERT INTO t3 VALUES(0,0,1,0);
+ INSERT INTO t3 VALUES(0,0,1,1);
+ INSERT INTO t3 VALUES(0,1,0,0);
+ INSERT INTO t3 VALUES(0,1,0,1);
+ INSERT INTO t3 VALUES(0,1,1,0);
+ INSERT INTO t3 VALUES(0,1,1,1);
+ INSERT INTO t3 VALUES(1,0,0,0);
+ INSERT INTO t3 VALUES(1,0,0,1);
+ INSERT INTO t3 VALUES(1,0,1,0);
+ INSERT INTO t3 VALUES(1,0,1,1);
+ INSERT INTO t3 VALUES(1,1,0,0);
+ INSERT INTO t3 VALUES(1,1,0,1);
+ INSERT INTO t3 VALUES(1,1,1,0);
+ INSERT INTO t3 VALUES(1,1,1,1);
+ SELECT count(*) FROM t3;
+ }
+} {16}
+do_test descidx1-5.2 {
+ cksort {
+ SELECT a||b||c||d FROM t3 ORDER BY a,b,c,d;
+ }
+} {0000 0001 0010 0011 0100 0101 0110 0111 1000 1001 1010 1011 1100 1101 1110 1111 sort}
+do_test descidx1-5.3 {
+ cksort {
+ SELECT a||b||c||d FROM t3 ORDER BY a DESC, b ASC, c DESC, d ASC;
+ }
+} {1010 1011 1000 1001 1110 1111 1100 1101 0010 0011 0000 0001 0110 0111 0100 0101 nosort}
+do_test descidx1-5.4 {
+ cksort {
+ SELECT a||b||c||d FROM t3 ORDER BY a ASC, b DESC, c ASC, d DESC;
+ }
+} {0101 0100 0111 0110 0001 0000 0011 0010 1101 1100 1111 1110 1001 1000 1011 1010 nosort}
+do_test descidx1-5.5 {
+ cksort {
+ SELECT a||b||c FROM t3 WHERE d=0 ORDER BY a DESC, b ASC, c DESC
+ }
+} {101 100 111 110 001 000 011 010 nosort}
+do_test descidx1-5.6 {
+ cksort {
+ SELECT a||b||c FROM t3 WHERE d=0 ORDER BY a ASC, b DESC, c ASC
+ }
+} {010 011 000 001 110 111 100 101 nosort}
+do_test descidx1-5.7 {
+ cksort {
+ SELECT a||b||c FROM t3 WHERE d=0 ORDER BY a ASC, b DESC, c DESC
+ }
+} {011 010 001 000 111 110 101 100 sort}
+do_test descidx1-5.8 {
+ cksort {
+ SELECT a||b||c FROM t3 WHERE d=0 ORDER BY a ASC, b ASC, c ASC
+ }
+} {000 001 010 011 100 101 110 111 sort}
+do_test descidx1-5.9 {
+ cksort {
+ SELECT a||b||c FROM t3 WHERE d=0 ORDER BY a DESC, b DESC, c ASC
+ }
+} {110 111 100 101 010 011 000 001 sort}
+
+# Test the legacy_file_format pragma here because we have access to
+# the get_file_format command.
+#
+ifcapable legacyformat {
+ do_test descidx1-6.1 {
+ db close
+ forcedelete test.db test.db-journal
+ sqlite3 db test.db
+ execsql {PRAGMA legacy_file_format}
+ } {1}
+} else {
+ do_test descidx1-6.1 {
+ db close
+ forcedelete test.db test.db-journal
+ sqlite3 db test.db
+ execsql {PRAGMA legacy_file_format}
+ } {0}
+}
+do_test descidx1-6.2 {
+ execsql {PRAGMA legacy_file_format=YES}
+ execsql {PRAGMA legacy_file_format}
+} {1}
+do_test descidx1-6.3 {
+ execsql {
+ CREATE TABLE t1(a,b,c);
+ }
+ get_file_format
+} {1}
+ifcapable vacuum {
+ # Verify that the file format is preserved across a vacuum.
+ do_test descidx1-6.3.1 {
+ execsql {VACUUM}
+ get_file_format
+ } {1}
+}
+do_test descidx1-6.4 {
+ db close
+ forcedelete test.db test.db-journal
+ sqlite3 db test.db
+ execsql {PRAGMA legacy_file_format=NO}
+ execsql {PRAGMA legacy_file_format}
+} {0}
+do_test descidx1-6.5 {
+ execsql {
+ CREATE TABLE t1(a,b,c);
+ CREATE INDEX i1 ON t1(a ASC, b DESC, c ASC);
+ INSERT INTO t1 VALUES(1,2,3);
+ INSERT INTO t1 VALUES(1,1,0);
+ INSERT INTO t1 VALUES(1,2,1);
+ INSERT INTO t1 VALUES(1,3,4);
+ }
+ get_file_format
+} {4}
+ifcapable vacuum {
+ # Verify that the file format is preserved across a vacuum.
+ do_test descidx1-6.6 {
+ execsql {VACUUM}
+ get_file_format
+ } {4}
+ do_test descidx1-6.7 {
+ execsql {
+ PRAGMA legacy_file_format=ON;
+ VACUUM;
+ }
+ get_file_format
+ } {4}
+}
+
+
+
+finish_test