Age | Commit message (Collapse) | Author |
|
so that whitelisting doesn't have to peek into the data.
added more documentation and some tests stubs too.
|
|
|
|
|
|
my goal here is also to start *real* unit tests for the keymanager, that
do not need an actual soledad implementation. this should make all the
coming tests much faster. I would like to have a common soledad stub
that follows the soledad api, but w/o actual disk persistance, and
migrate all the bulk of the keymanager tests to these unit tests.
|
|
This has been previously encapsulated in a dict, and the commands were
not modified accordingly.
I'm adding some very basic test for the KeymanagerService public api
contract.
- Resolves: #8577
|
|
in the variant that was merged, we call a failure method to get the
exception, so it's better to test a real failure initialized with an
exception.
besides, I'm starting to hate mocks.
|
|
This commit originall contained a fix for a wrong variable name that
avoided the outgoing service to be launched. This had been fixed in a
concurrent mr that got merged before this one. However, this MR
contained a couple of tests for the OutgoingService, and I'm merging
those tests now.
|
|
|