Small fixes here and there

1 files changed, 14 insertions, 15 deletions

diff --git a/pages/about-us/news/2020/linux-packaging.md b/pages/about-us/news/2020/linux-packaging.md
index a79f325..365ec4f 100644
--- a/pages/about-us/news/2020/linux-packaging.md
+++ b/pages/about-us/news/2020/linux-packaging.md
@@ -4,33 +4,32 @@
 @more = true
 @preview_image = '/img/pages/gummi-penguins.jpg'
 
-We get frequently asked why we don't do flatpack or appimage or arch packages or 
-... There are many distros and many package managers in GNU/Linux. Sadly our 
-time is limited and we have to decide what we focus or energies on. And 
+We get frequently asked why we don't do flatpack or appimage or arch packages 
+or... for our VPN. There are many distros and many package managers in GNU/Linux. Sadly our 
+time is limited and we have to decide what we focus our energies on. And 
 currently in GNU/Linux we are focusing our work on [snap 
 packages](https://snapcraft.io/riseup-vpn).
 
 I know, snap has many problems. Packages often don't work well in distros not 
-based in debian ([#272](https://0xacab.org/leap/bitmask-vpn/-/issues/272), 
+based on debian ([#272](https://0xacab.org/leap/bitmask-vpn/-/issues/272), 
 [#77](https://0xacab.org/leap/bitmask-vpn/-/issues/77)). It's a centralized 
-platform, controlled by one commercial entity that not [everybody agrees with 
-its 
-decisions](https://jatan.blog/2020/05/02/ubuntu-snap-obsession-has-snapped-me-off-of-it/).
+platform, controlled by one commercial entity and [not everybody agrees with 
+their decisions] (https://jatan.blog/2020/05/02/ubuntu-snap-obsession-has-snapped-me-off-of-it/).
 
-Our primary target audience has always being the less computer wise users. In 
-GNU/Linux most of these users use ubuntu. That has been our main reason to focus 
-our energies on supporting ubuntu users. And snap makes it very easy to include 
-software in ubuntu so is easy to install in this platform.  Also the most used 
+Our primary target audience has always been the less computer-savvy users. In 
+GNU/Linux most of them use ubuntu. That has been our main reason to focus 
+our energies on supporting ubuntu first. And snap makes it very easy to include 
+software in ubuntu which is convenient too.  Also the most used 
 distros around are debian based, and snap usually works well on those.
 
-Knowing that not everybody likes snap we produce [.deb 
+Knowing that not everybody likes snap, we produce [.deb 
 packages](https://riseup.net/en/vpn/linux#package-installation) as well, and we 
 do our best to keep them up to date.
 
-One of the other options we have explored is flatpack. I think it's architecture 
+One of the other options we have explored is flatpack. I think its architecture 
 is great, its security is really nice and it solves some of the problems of snap 
-(is not centralized, the control is in the users, ...). But flatpack is designed 
-to containerize the applications, making impossible to package something like a 
+(it's not centralized, the control is in the users, ...). But flatpack is designed 
+to containerize the applications, making it impossible to package something like a 
 VPN, because it needs to modify the network configuration and the firewall 
 which is by design not allowed by flatpack. So, for us flatpack is not an 
 option.