From 7bb481fda9ecb134804b49c2ce77ca28f7eea583 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: Hans-Christoph Steiner Date: Fri, 30 Mar 2012 20:42:12 -0400 Subject: Imported Upstream version 2.0.3 --- test/where.test | 1260 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++ 1 file changed, 1260 insertions(+) create mode 100644 test/where.test (limited to 'test/where.test') diff --git a/test/where.test b/test/where.test new file mode 100644 index 0000000..9145bcc --- /dev/null +++ b/test/where.test @@ -0,0 +1,1260 @@ +# 2001 September 15 +# +# The author disclaims copyright to this source code. In place of +# a legal notice, here is a blessing: +# +# May you do good and not evil. +# May you find forgiveness for yourself and forgive others. +# May you share freely, never taking more than you give. +# +#*********************************************************************** +# This file implements regression tests for SQLite library. The +# focus of this file is testing the use of indices in WHERE clases. +# +# $Id: where.test,v 1.50 2008/11/03 09:06:06 danielk1977 Exp $ + +set testdir [file dirname $argv0] +source $testdir/tester.tcl + +# Build some test data +# +do_test where-1.0 { + execsql { + CREATE TABLE t1(w int, x int, y int); + CREATE TABLE t2(p int, q int, r int, s int); + } + for {set i 1} {$i<=100} {incr i} { + set w $i + set x [expr {int(log($i)/log(2))}] + set y [expr {$i*$i + 2*$i + 1}] + execsql "INSERT INTO t1 VALUES($w,$x,$y)" + } + + ifcapable subquery { + execsql { + INSERT INTO t2 SELECT 101-w, x, (SELECT max(y) FROM t1)+1-y, y FROM t1; + } + } else { + set maxy [execsql {select max(y) from t1}] + execsql " + INSERT INTO t2 SELECT 101-w, x, $maxy+1-y, y FROM t1; + " + } + + execsql { + CREATE INDEX i1w ON t1(w); + CREATE INDEX i1xy ON t1(x,y); + CREATE INDEX i2p ON t2(p); + CREATE INDEX i2r ON t2(r); + CREATE INDEX i2qs ON t2(q, s); + } +} {} + +# Do an SQL statement. Append the search count to the end of the result. +# +proc count sql { + set ::sqlite_search_count 0 + return [concat [execsql $sql] $::sqlite_search_count] +} + +# Verify that queries use an index. We are using the special variable +# "sqlite_search_count" which tallys the number of executions of MoveTo +# and Next operators in the VDBE. By verifing that the search count is +# small we can be assured that indices are being used properly. +# +do_test where-1.1.1 { + count {SELECT x, y, w FROM t1 WHERE w=10} +} {3 121 10 3} +do_test where-1.1.2 { + set sqlite_query_plan +} {t1 i1w} +do_test where-1.1.3 { + db status step +} {0} +do_test where-1.1.4 { + db eval {SELECT x, y, w FROM t1 WHERE +w=10} +} {3 121 10} +do_test where-1.1.5 { + db status step +} {99} +do_test where-1.1.6 { + set sqlite_query_plan +} {t1 {}} +do_test where-1.1.7 { + count {SELECT x, y, w AS abc FROM t1 WHERE abc=10} +} {3 121 10 3} +do_test where-1.1.8 { + set sqlite_query_plan +} {t1 i1w} +do_test where-1.1.9 { + db status step +} {0} +do_test where-1.2.1 { + count {SELECT x, y, w FROM t1 WHERE w=11} +} {3 144 11 3} +do_test where-1.2.2 { + count {SELECT x, y, w AS abc FROM t1 WHERE abc=11} +} {3 144 11 3} +do_test where-1.3.1 { + count {SELECT x, y, w AS abc FROM t1 WHERE 11=w} +} {3 144 11 3} +do_test where-1.3.2 { + count {SELECT x, y, w AS abc FROM t1 WHERE 11=abc} +} {3 144 11 3} +do_test where-1.4.1 { + count {SELECT w, x, y FROM t1 WHERE 11=w AND x>2} +} {11 3 144 3} +do_test where-1.4.2 { + set sqlite_query_plan +} {t1 i1w} +do_test where-1.4.3 { + count {SELECT w AS a, x AS b, y FROM t1 WHERE 11=a AND b>2} +} {11 3 144 3} +do_test where-1.4.4 { + set sqlite_query_plan +} {t1 i1w} +do_test where-1.5 { + count {SELECT x, y FROM t1 WHERE y<200 AND w=11 AND x>2} +} {3 144 3} +do_test where-1.5.2 { + set sqlite_query_plan +} {t1 i1w} +do_test where-1.6 { + count {SELECT x, y FROM t1 WHERE y<200 AND x>2 AND w=11} +} {3 144 3} +do_test where-1.7 { + count {SELECT x, y FROM t1 WHERE w=11 AND y<200 AND x>2} +} {3 144 3} +do_test where-1.8 { + count {SELECT x, y FROM t1 WHERE w>10 AND y=144 AND x=3} +} {3 144 3} +do_test where-1.8.2 { + set sqlite_query_plan +} {t1 i1xy} +do_test where-1.8.3 { + count {SELECT x, y FROM t1 WHERE y=144 AND x=3} + set sqlite_query_plan +} {{} i1xy} +do_test where-1.9 { + count {SELECT x, y FROM t1 WHERE y=144 AND w>10 AND x=3} +} {3 144 3} +do_test where-1.10 { + count {SELECT x, y FROM t1 WHERE x=3 AND w>=10 AND y=121} +} {3 121 3} +do_test where-1.11 { + count {SELECT x, y FROM t1 WHERE x=3 AND y=100 AND w<10} +} {3 100 3} + +# New for SQLite version 2.1: Verify that that inequality constraints +# are used correctly. +# +do_test where-1.12 { + count {SELECT w FROM t1 WHERE x=3 AND y<100} +} {8 3} +do_test where-1.13 { + count {SELECT w FROM t1 WHERE x=3 AND 100>y} +} {8 3} +do_test where-1.14 { + count {SELECT w FROM t1 WHERE 3=x AND y<100} +} {8 3} +do_test where-1.15 { + count {SELECT w FROM t1 WHERE 3=x AND 100>y} +} {8 3} +do_test where-1.16 { + count {SELECT w FROM t1 WHERE x=3 AND y<=100} +} {8 9 5} +do_test where-1.17 { + count {SELECT w FROM t1 WHERE x=3 AND 100>=y} +} {8 9 5} +do_test where-1.18 { + count {SELECT w FROM t1 WHERE x=3 AND y>225} +} {15 3} +do_test where-1.19 { + count {SELECT w FROM t1 WHERE x=3 AND 225=225} +} {14 15 5} +do_test where-1.21 { + count {SELECT w FROM t1 WHERE x=3 AND 225<=y} +} {14 15 5} +do_test where-1.22 { + count {SELECT w FROM t1 WHERE x=3 AND y>121 AND y<196} +} {11 12 5} +do_test where-1.23 { + count {SELECT w FROM t1 WHERE x=3 AND y>=121 AND y<=196} +} {10 11 12 13 9} +do_test where-1.24 { + count {SELECT w FROM t1 WHERE x=3 AND 121y} +} {11 12 5} +do_test where-1.25 { + count {SELECT w FROM t1 WHERE x=3 AND 121<=y AND 196>=y} +} {10 11 12 13 9} + +# Need to work on optimizing the BETWEEN operator. +# +# do_test where-1.26 { +# count {SELECT w FROM t1 WHERE x=3 AND y BETWEEN 121 AND 196} +# } {10 11 12 13 9} + +do_test where-1.27 { + count {SELECT w FROM t1 WHERE x=3 AND y+1==122} +} {10 10} + +do_test where-1.28 { + count {SELECT w FROM t1 WHERE x+1=4 AND y+1==122} +} {10 99} +do_test where-1.29 { + count {SELECT w FROM t1 WHERE y==121} +} {10 99} + + +do_test where-1.30 { + count {SELECT w FROM t1 WHERE w>97} +} {98 99 100 3} +do_test where-1.31 { + count {SELECT w FROM t1 WHERE w>=97} +} {97 98 99 100 4} +do_test where-1.33 { + count {SELECT w FROM t1 WHERE w==97} +} {97 2} +do_test where-1.33.1 { + count {SELECT w FROM t1 WHERE w<=97 AND w==97} +} {97 2} +do_test where-1.33.2 { + count {SELECT w FROM t1 WHERE w<98 AND w==97} +} {97 2} +do_test where-1.33.3 { + count {SELECT w FROM t1 WHERE w>=97 AND w==97} +} {97 2} +do_test where-1.33.4 { + count {SELECT w FROM t1 WHERE w>96 AND w==97} +} {97 2} +do_test where-1.33.5 { + count {SELECT w FROM t1 WHERE w==97 AND w==97} +} {97 2} +do_test where-1.34 { + count {SELECT w FROM t1 WHERE w+1==98} +} {97 99} +do_test where-1.35 { + count {SELECT w FROM t1 WHERE w<3} +} {1 2 2} +do_test where-1.36 { + count {SELECT w FROM t1 WHERE w<=3} +} {1 2 3 3} +do_test where-1.37 { + count {SELECT w FROM t1 WHERE w+1<=4 ORDER BY w} +} {1 2 3 99} + +do_test where-1.38 { + count {SELECT (w) FROM t1 WHERE (w)>(97)} +} {98 99 100 3} +do_test where-1.39 { + count {SELECT (w) FROM t1 WHERE (w)>=(97)} +} {97 98 99 100 4} +do_test where-1.40 { + count {SELECT (w) FROM t1 WHERE (w)==(97)} +} {97 2} +do_test where-1.41 { + count {SELECT (w) FROM t1 WHERE ((w)+(1))==(98)} +} {97 99} + + +# Do the same kind of thing except use a join as the data source. +# +do_test where-2.1 { + count { + SELECT w, p FROM t2, t1 + WHERE x=q AND y=s AND r=8977 + } +} {34 67 6} +do_test where-2.2 { + count { + SELECT w, p FROM t2, t1 + WHERE x=q AND s=y AND r=8977 + } +} {34 67 6} +do_test where-2.3 { + count { + SELECT w, p FROM t2, t1 + WHERE x=q AND s=y AND r=8977 AND w>10 + } +} {34 67 6} +do_test where-2.4 { + count { + SELECT w, p FROM t2, t1 + WHERE p<80 AND x=q AND s=y AND r=8977 AND w>10 + } +} {34 67 6} +do_test where-2.5 { + count { + SELECT w, p FROM t2, t1 + WHERE p<80 AND x=q AND 8977=r AND s=y AND w>10 + } +} {34 67 6} +do_test where-2.6 { + count { + SELECT w, p FROM t2, t1 + WHERE x=q AND p=77 AND s=y AND w>5 + } +} {24 77 6} +do_test where-2.7 { + count { + SELECT w, p FROM t1, t2 + WHERE x=q AND p>77 AND s=y AND w=5 + } +} {5 96 6} + +# Lets do a 3-way join. +# +do_test where-3.1 { + count { + SELECT A.w, B.p, C.w FROM t1 as A, t2 as B, t1 as C + WHERE C.w=101-B.p AND B.r=10202-A.y AND A.w=11 + } +} {11 90 11 8} +do_test where-3.2 { + count { + SELECT A.w, B.p, C.w FROM t1 as A, t2 as B, t1 as C + WHERE C.w=101-B.p AND B.r=10202-A.y AND A.w=12 + } +} {12 89 12 8} +do_test where-3.3 { + count { + SELECT A.w, B.p, C.w FROM t1 as A, t2 as B, t1 as C + WHERE A.w=15 AND B.p=C.w AND B.r=10202-A.y + } +} {15 86 86 8} + +# Test to see that the special case of a constant WHERE clause is +# handled. +# +do_test where-4.1 { + count { + SELECT * FROM t1 WHERE 0 + } +} {0} +do_test where-4.2 { + count { + SELECT * FROM t1 WHERE 1 LIMIT 1 + } +} {1 0 4 0} +do_test where-4.3 { + execsql { + SELECT 99 WHERE 0 + } +} {} +do_test where-4.4 { + execsql { + SELECT 99 WHERE 1 + } +} {99} +do_test where-4.5 { + execsql { + SELECT 99 WHERE 0.1 + } +} {99} +do_test where-4.6 { + execsql { + SELECT 99 WHERE 0.0 + } +} {} +do_test where-4.7 { + execsql { + SELECT count(*) FROM t1 WHERE t1.w + } +} {100} + +# Verify that IN operators in a WHERE clause are handled correctly. +# Omit these tests if the build is not capable of sub-queries. +# +ifcapable subquery { + do_test where-5.1 { + count { + SELECT * FROM t1 WHERE rowid IN (1,2,3,1234) order by 1; + } + } {1 0 4 2 1 9 3 1 16 4} + do_test where-5.2 { + count { + SELECT * FROM t1 WHERE rowid+0 IN (1,2,3,1234) order by 1; + } + } {1 0 4 2 1 9 3 1 16 102} + do_test where-5.3 { + count { + SELECT * FROM t1 WHERE w IN (-1,1,2,3) order by 1; + } + } {1 0 4 2 1 9 3 1 16 14} + do_test where-5.4 { + count { + SELECT * FROM t1 WHERE w+0 IN (-1,1,2,3) order by 1; + } + } {1 0 4 2 1 9 3 1 16 102} + do_test where-5.5 { + count { + SELECT * FROM t1 WHERE rowid IN + (select rowid from t1 where rowid IN (-1,2,4)) + ORDER BY 1; + } + } {2 1 9 4 2 25 3} + do_test where-5.6 { + count { + SELECT * FROM t1 WHERE rowid+0 IN + (select rowid from t1 where rowid IN (-1,2,4)) + ORDER BY 1; + } + } {2 1 9 4 2 25 103} + do_test where-5.7 { + count { + SELECT * FROM t1 WHERE w IN + (select rowid from t1 where rowid IN (-1,2,4)) + ORDER BY 1; + } + } {2 1 9 4 2 25 9} + do_test where-5.8 { + count { + SELECT * FROM t1 WHERE w+0 IN + (select rowid from t1 where rowid IN (-1,2,4)) + ORDER BY 1; + } + } {2 1 9 4 2 25 103} + do_test where-5.9 { + count { + SELECT * FROM t1 WHERE x IN (1,7) ORDER BY 1; + } + } {2 1 9 3 1 16 7} + do_test where-5.10 { + count { + SELECT * FROM t1 WHERE x+0 IN (1,7) ORDER BY 1; + } + } {2 1 9 3 1 16 199} + do_test where-5.11 { + count { + SELECT * FROM t1 WHERE y IN (6400,8100) ORDER BY 1; + } + } {79 6 6400 89 6 8100 199} + do_test where-5.12 { + count { + SELECT * FROM t1 WHERE x=6 AND y IN (6400,8100) ORDER BY 1; + } + } {79 6 6400 89 6 8100 7} + do_test where-5.13 { + count { + SELECT * FROM t1 WHERE x IN (1,7) AND y NOT IN (6400,8100) ORDER BY 1; + } + } {2 1 9 3 1 16 7} + do_test where-5.14 { + count { + SELECT * FROM t1 WHERE x IN (1,7) AND y IN (9,10) ORDER BY 1; + } + } {2 1 9 8} + do_test where-5.15 { + count { + SELECT * FROM t1 WHERE x IN (1,7) AND y IN (9,16) ORDER BY 1; + } + } {2 1 9 3 1 16 11} +} + +# This procedure executes the SQL. Then it checks to see if the OP_Sort +# opcode was executed. If an OP_Sort did occur, then "sort" is appended +# to the result. If no OP_Sort happened, then "nosort" is appended. +# +# This procedure is used to check to make sure sorting is or is not +# occurring as expected. +# +proc cksort {sql} { + set data [execsql $sql] + if {[db status sort]} {set x sort} {set x nosort} + lappend data $x + return $data +} +# Check out the logic that attempts to implement the ORDER BY clause +# using an index rather than by sorting. +# +do_test where-6.1 { + execsql { + CREATE TABLE t3(a,b,c); + CREATE INDEX t3a ON t3(a); + CREATE INDEX t3bc ON t3(b,c); + CREATE INDEX t3acb ON t3(a,c,b); + INSERT INTO t3 SELECT w, 101-w, y FROM t1; + SELECT count(*), sum(a), sum(b), sum(c) FROM t3; + } +} {100 5050 5050 348550} +do_test where-6.2 { + cksort { + SELECT * FROM t3 ORDER BY a LIMIT 3 + } +} {1 100 4 2 99 9 3 98 16 nosort} +do_test where-6.3 { + cksort { + SELECT * FROM t3 ORDER BY a+1 LIMIT 3 + } +} {1 100 4 2 99 9 3 98 16 sort} +do_test where-6.4 { + cksort { + SELECT * FROM t3 WHERE a<10 ORDER BY a LIMIT 3 + } +} {1 100 4 2 99 9 3 98 16 nosort} +do_test where-6.5 { + cksort { + SELECT * FROM t3 WHERE a>0 AND a<10 ORDER BY a LIMIT 3 + } +} {1 100 4 2 99 9 3 98 16 nosort} +do_test where-6.6 { + cksort { + SELECT * FROM t3 WHERE a>0 ORDER BY a LIMIT 3 + } +} {1 100 4 2 99 9 3 98 16 nosort} +do_test where-6.7 { + cksort { + SELECT * FROM t3 WHERE b>0 ORDER BY a LIMIT 3 + } +} {1 100 4 2 99 9 3 98 16 nosort} +ifcapable subquery { + do_test where-6.8 { + cksort { + SELECT * FROM t3 WHERE a IN (3,5,7,1,9,4,2) ORDER BY a LIMIT 3 + } + } {1 100 4 2 99 9 3 98 16 sort} +} +do_test where-6.9.1 { + cksort { + SELECT * FROM t3 WHERE a=1 AND c>0 ORDER BY a LIMIT 3 + } +} {1 100 4 nosort} +do_test where-6.9.1.1 { + cksort { + SELECT * FROM t3 WHERE a>=1 AND a=1 AND c>0 ORDER BY a LIMIT 3 + } +} {1 100 4 nosort} +do_test where-6.9.1.2 { + cksort { + SELECT * FROM t3 WHERE a<2 AND a=1 AND c>0 ORDER BY a LIMIT 3 + } +} {1 100 4 nosort} +do_test where-6.9.2 { + cksort { + SELECT * FROM t3 WHERE a=1 AND c>0 ORDER BY a,c LIMIT 3 + } +} {1 100 4 nosort} +do_test where-6.9.3 { + cksort { + SELECT * FROM t3 WHERE a=1 AND c>0 ORDER BY c LIMIT 3 + } +} {1 100 4 nosort} +do_test where-6.9.4 { + cksort { + SELECT * FROM t3 WHERE a=1 AND c>0 ORDER BY a DESC LIMIT 3 + } +} {1 100 4 nosort} +do_test where-6.9.5 { + cksort { + SELECT * FROM t3 WHERE a=1 AND c>0 ORDER BY a DESC, c DESC LIMIT 3 + } +} {1 100 4 nosort} +do_test where-6.9.6 { + cksort { + SELECT * FROM t3 WHERE a=1 AND c>0 ORDER BY c DESC LIMIT 3 + } +} {1 100 4 nosort} +do_test where-6.9.7 { + cksort { + SELECT * FROM t3 WHERE a=1 AND c>0 ORDER BY c,a LIMIT 3 + } +} {1 100 4 sort} +do_test where-6.9.8 { + cksort { + SELECT * FROM t3 WHERE a=1 AND c>0 ORDER BY a DESC, c ASC LIMIT 3 + } +} {1 100 4 nosort} +do_test where-6.9.9 { + cksort { + SELECT * FROM t3 WHERE a=1 AND c>0 ORDER BY a ASC, c DESC LIMIT 3 + } +} {1 100 4 nosort} +do_test where-6.10 { + cksort { + SELECT * FROM t3 WHERE a=1 AND c>0 ORDER BY a LIMIT 3 + } +} {1 100 4 nosort} +do_test where-6.11 { + cksort { + SELECT * FROM t3 WHERE a=1 AND c>0 ORDER BY a,c LIMIT 3 + } +} {1 100 4 nosort} +do_test where-6.12 { + cksort { + SELECT * FROM t3 WHERE a=1 AND c>0 ORDER BY a,c,b LIMIT 3 + } +} {1 100 4 nosort} +do_test where-6.13 { + cksort { + SELECT * FROM t3 WHERE a>0 ORDER BY a DESC LIMIT 3 + } +} {100 1 10201 99 2 10000 98 3 9801 nosort} +do_test where-6.13.1 { + cksort { + SELECT * FROM t3 WHERE a>0 ORDER BY -a LIMIT 3 + } +} {100 1 10201 99 2 10000 98 3 9801 sort} +do_test where-6.14 { + cksort { + SELECT * FROM t3 ORDER BY b LIMIT 3 + } +} {100 1 10201 99 2 10000 98 3 9801 nosort} +do_test where-6.15 { + cksort { + SELECT t3.a, t1.x FROM t3, t1 WHERE t3.a=t1.w ORDER BY t3.a LIMIT 3 + } +} {1 0 2 1 3 1 nosort} +do_test where-6.16 { + cksort { + SELECT t3.a, t1.x FROM t3, t1 WHERE t3.a=t1.w ORDER BY t1.x, t3.a LIMIT 3 + } +} {1 0 2 1 3 1 sort} +do_test where-6.19 { + cksort { + SELECT y FROM t1 ORDER BY w LIMIT 3; + } +} {4 9 16 nosort} +do_test where-6.20 { + cksort { + SELECT y FROM t1 ORDER BY rowid LIMIT 3; + } +} {4 9 16 nosort} +do_test where-6.21 { + cksort { + SELECT y FROM t1 ORDER BY rowid, y LIMIT 3; + } +} {4 9 16 nosort} +do_test where-6.22 { + cksort { + SELECT y FROM t1 ORDER BY rowid, y DESC LIMIT 3; + } +} {4 9 16 nosort} +do_test where-6.23 { + cksort { + SELECT y FROM t1 WHERE y>4 ORDER BY rowid, w, x LIMIT 3; + } +} {9 16 25 nosort} +do_test where-6.24 { + cksort { + SELECT y FROM t1 WHERE y>=9 ORDER BY rowid, x DESC, w LIMIT 3; + } +} {9 16 25 nosort} +do_test where-6.25 { + cksort { + SELECT y FROM t1 WHERE y>4 AND y<25 ORDER BY rowid; + } +} {9 16 nosort} +do_test where-6.26 { + cksort { + SELECT y FROM t1 WHERE y>=4 AND y<=25 ORDER BY oid; + } +} {4 9 16 25 nosort} +do_test where-6.27 { + cksort { + SELECT y FROM t1 WHERE y<=25 ORDER BY _rowid_, w+y; + } +} {4 9 16 25 nosort} + + +# Tests for reverse-order sorting. +# +do_test where-7.1 { + cksort { + SELECT w FROM t1 WHERE x=3 ORDER BY y; + } +} {8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 nosort} +do_test where-7.2 { + cksort { + SELECT w FROM t1 WHERE x=3 ORDER BY y DESC; + } +} {15 14 13 12 11 10 9 8 nosort} +do_test where-7.3 { + cksort { + SELECT w FROM t1 WHERE x=3 AND y>100 ORDER BY y LIMIT 3; + } +} {10 11 12 nosort} +do_test where-7.4 { + cksort { + SELECT w FROM t1 WHERE x=3 AND y>100 ORDER BY y DESC LIMIT 3; + } +} {15 14 13 nosort} +do_test where-7.5 { + cksort { + SELECT w FROM t1 WHERE x=3 AND y>121 ORDER BY y DESC; + } +} {15 14 13 12 11 nosort} +do_test where-7.6 { + cksort { + SELECT w FROM t1 WHERE x=3 AND y>=121 ORDER BY y DESC; + } +} {15 14 13 12 11 10 nosort} +do_test where-7.7 { + cksort { + SELECT w FROM t1 WHERE x=3 AND y>=121 AND y<196 ORDER BY y DESC; + } +} {12 11 10 nosort} +do_test where-7.8 { + cksort { + SELECT w FROM t1 WHERE x=3 AND y>=121 AND y<=196 ORDER BY y DESC; + } +} {13 12 11 10 nosort} +do_test where-7.9 { + cksort { + SELECT w FROM t1 WHERE x=3 AND y>121 AND y<=196 ORDER BY y DESC; + } +} {13 12 11 nosort} +do_test where-7.10 { + cksort { + SELECT w FROM t1 WHERE x=3 AND y>100 AND y<196 ORDER BY y DESC; + } +} {12 11 10 nosort} +do_test where-7.11 { + cksort { + SELECT w FROM t1 WHERE x=3 AND y>=121 AND y<196 ORDER BY y; + } +} {10 11 12 nosort} +do_test where-7.12 { + cksort { + SELECT w FROM t1 WHERE x=3 AND y>=121 AND y<=196 ORDER BY y; + } +} {10 11 12 13 nosort} +do_test where-7.13 { + cksort { + SELECT w FROM t1 WHERE x=3 AND y>121 AND y<=196 ORDER BY y; + } +} {11 12 13 nosort} +do_test where-7.14 { + cksort { + SELECT w FROM t1 WHERE x=3 AND y>100 AND y<196 ORDER BY y; + } +} {10 11 12 nosort} +do_test where-7.15 { + cksort { + SELECT w FROM t1 WHERE x=3 AND y<81 ORDER BY y; + } +} {nosort} +do_test where-7.16 { + cksort { + SELECT w FROM t1 WHERE x=3 AND y<=81 ORDER BY y; + } +} {8 nosort} +do_test where-7.17 { + cksort { + SELECT w FROM t1 WHERE x=3 AND y>256 ORDER BY y; + } +} {nosort} +do_test where-7.18 { + cksort { + SELECT w FROM t1 WHERE x=3 AND y>=256 ORDER BY y; + } +} {15 nosort} +do_test where-7.19 { + cksort { + SELECT w FROM t1 WHERE x=3 AND y<81 ORDER BY y DESC; + } +} {nosort} +do_test where-7.20 { + cksort { + SELECT w FROM t1 WHERE x=3 AND y<=81 ORDER BY y DESC; + } +} {8 nosort} +do_test where-7.21 { + cksort { + SELECT w FROM t1 WHERE x=3 AND y>256 ORDER BY y DESC; + } +} {nosort} +do_test where-7.22 { + cksort { + SELECT w FROM t1 WHERE x=3 AND y>=256 ORDER BY y DESC; + } +} {15 nosort} +do_test where-7.23 { + cksort { + SELECT w FROM t1 WHERE x=0 AND y<4 ORDER BY y; + } +} {nosort} +do_test where-7.24 { + cksort { + SELECT w FROM t1 WHERE x=0 AND y<=4 ORDER BY y; + } +} {1 nosort} +do_test where-7.25 { + cksort { + SELECT w FROM t1 WHERE x=6 AND y>10201 ORDER BY y; + } +} {nosort} +do_test where-7.26 { + cksort { + SELECT w FROM t1 WHERE x=6 AND y>=10201 ORDER BY y; + } +} {100 nosort} +do_test where-7.27 { + cksort { + SELECT w FROM t1 WHERE x=0 AND y<4 ORDER BY y DESC; + } +} {nosort} +do_test where-7.28 { + cksort { + SELECT w FROM t1 WHERE x=0 AND y<=4 ORDER BY y DESC; + } +} {1 nosort} +do_test where-7.29 { + cksort { + SELECT w FROM t1 WHERE x=6 AND y>10201 ORDER BY y DESC; + } +} {nosort} +do_test where-7.30 { + cksort { + SELECT w FROM t1 WHERE x=6 AND y>=10201 ORDER BY y DESC; + } +} {100 nosort} +do_test where-7.31 { + cksort { + SELECT y FROM t1 ORDER BY rowid DESC LIMIT 3 + } +} {10201 10000 9801 nosort} +do_test where-7.32 { + cksort { + SELECT y FROM t1 WHERE y<25 ORDER BY rowid DESC + } +} {16 9 4 nosort} +do_test where-7.33 { + cksort { + SELECT y FROM t1 WHERE y<=25 ORDER BY rowid DESC + } +} {25 16 9 4 nosort} +do_test where-7.34 { + cksort { + SELECT y FROM t1 WHERE y<25 AND y>4 ORDER BY rowid DESC, y DESC + } +} {16 9 nosort} +do_test where-7.35 { + cksort { + SELECT y FROM t1 WHERE y<25 AND y>=4 ORDER BY rowid DESC + } +} {16 9 4 nosort} + +do_test where-8.1 { + execsql { + CREATE TABLE t4 AS SELECT * FROM t1; + CREATE INDEX i4xy ON t4(x,y); + } + cksort { + SELECT w FROM t4 WHERE x=4 and y<1000 ORDER BY y DESC limit 3; + } +} {30 29 28 nosort} +do_test where-8.2 { + execsql { + DELETE FROM t4; + } + cksort { + SELECT w FROM t4 WHERE x=4 and y<1000 ORDER BY y DESC limit 3; + } +} {nosort} + +# Make sure searches with an index work with an empty table. +# +do_test where-9.1 { + execsql { + CREATE TABLE t5(x PRIMARY KEY); + SELECT * FROM t5 WHERE x<10; + } +} {} +do_test where-9.2 { + execsql { + SELECT * FROM t5 WHERE x<10 ORDER BY x DESC; + } +} {} +do_test where-9.3 { + execsql { + SELECT * FROM t5 WHERE x=10; + } +} {} + +do_test where-10.1 { + execsql { + SELECT 1 WHERE abs(random())<0 + } +} {} +do_test where-10.2 { + proc tclvar_func {vname} {return [set ::$vname]} + db function tclvar tclvar_func + set ::v1 0 + execsql { + SELECT count(*) FROM t1 WHERE tclvar('v1'); + } +} {0} +do_test where-10.3 { + set ::v1 1 + execsql { + SELECT count(*) FROM t1 WHERE tclvar('v1'); + } +} {100} +do_test where-10.4 { + set ::v1 1 + proc tclvar_func {vname} { + upvar #0 $vname v + set v [expr {!$v}] + return $v + } + execsql { + SELECT count(*) FROM t1 WHERE tclvar('v1'); + } +} {50} + +# Ticket #1376. The query below was causing a segfault. +# The problem was the age-old error of calling realloc() on an +# array while there are still pointers to individual elements of +# that array. +# +do_test where-11.1 { + execsql { + CREATE TABLE t99(Dte INT, X INT); + DELETE FROM t99 WHERE (Dte = 2451337) OR (Dte = 2451339) OR + (Dte BETWEEN 2451345 AND 2451347) OR (Dte = 2451351) OR + (Dte BETWEEN 2451355 AND 2451356) OR (Dte = 2451358) OR + (Dte = 2451362) OR (Dte = 2451365) OR (Dte = 2451367) OR + (Dte BETWEEN 2451372 AND 2451376) OR (Dte BETWEEN 2451382 AND 2451384) OR + (Dte = 2451387) OR (Dte BETWEEN 2451389 AND 2451391) OR + (Dte BETWEEN 2451393 AND 2451395) OR (Dte = 2451400) OR + (Dte = 2451402) OR (Dte = 2451404) OR (Dte BETWEEN 2451416 AND 2451418) OR + (Dte = 2451422) OR (Dte = 2451426) OR (Dte BETWEEN 2451445 AND 2451446) OR + (Dte = 2451456) OR (Dte = 2451458) OR (Dte BETWEEN 2451465 AND 2451467) OR + (Dte BETWEEN 2451469 AND 2451471) OR (Dte = 2451474) OR + (Dte BETWEEN 2451477 AND 2451501) OR (Dte BETWEEN 2451503 AND 2451509) OR + (Dte BETWEEN 2451511 AND 2451514) OR (Dte BETWEEN 2451518 AND 2451521) OR + (Dte BETWEEN 2451523 AND 2451531) OR (Dte BETWEEN 2451533 AND 2451537) OR + (Dte BETWEEN 2451539 AND 2451544) OR (Dte BETWEEN 2451546 AND 2451551) OR + (Dte BETWEEN 2451553 AND 2451555) OR (Dte = 2451557) OR + (Dte BETWEEN 2451559 AND 2451561) OR (Dte = 2451563) OR + (Dte BETWEEN 2451565 AND 2451566) OR (Dte BETWEEN 2451569 AND 2451571) OR + (Dte = 2451573) OR (Dte = 2451575) OR (Dte = 2451577) OR (Dte = 2451581) OR + (Dte BETWEEN 2451583 AND 2451586) OR (Dte BETWEEN 2451588 AND 2451592) OR + (Dte BETWEEN 2451596 AND 2451598) OR (Dte = 2451600) OR + (Dte BETWEEN 2451602 AND 2451603) OR (Dte = 2451606) OR (Dte = 2451611); + } +} {} + +# Ticket #2116: Make sure sorting by index works well with nn INTEGER PRIMARY +# KEY. +# +do_test where-12.1 { + execsql { + CREATE TABLE t6(a INTEGER PRIMARY KEY, b TEXT); + INSERT INTO t6 VALUES(1,'one'); + INSERT INTO t6 VALUES(4,'four'); + CREATE INDEX t6i1 ON t6(b); + } + cksort { + SELECT * FROM t6 ORDER BY b; + } +} {4 four 1 one nosort} +do_test where-12.2 { + cksort { + SELECT * FROM t6 ORDER BY b, a; + } +} {4 four 1 one nosort} +do_test where-12.3 { + cksort { + SELECT * FROM t6 ORDER BY a; + } +} {1 one 4 four nosort} +do_test where-12.4 { + cksort { + SELECT * FROM t6 ORDER BY a, b; + } +} {1 one 4 four nosort} +do_test where-12.5 { + cksort { + SELECT * FROM t6 ORDER BY b DESC; + } +} {1 one 4 four nosort} +do_test where-12.6 { + cksort { + SELECT * FROM t6 ORDER BY b DESC, a DESC; + } +} {1 one 4 four nosort} +do_test where-12.7 { + cksort { + SELECT * FROM t6 ORDER BY b DESC, a ASC; + } +} {1 one 4 four sort} +do_test where-12.8 { + cksort { + SELECT * FROM t6 ORDER BY b ASC, a DESC; + } +} {4 four 1 one sort} +do_test where-12.9 { + cksort { + SELECT * FROM t6 ORDER BY a DESC; + } +} {4 four 1 one nosort} +do_test where-12.10 { + cksort { + SELECT * FROM t6 ORDER BY a DESC, b DESC; + } +} {4 four 1 one nosort} +do_test where-12.11 { + cksort { + SELECT * FROM t6 ORDER BY a DESC, b ASC; + } +} {4 four 1 one nosort} +do_test where-12.12 { + cksort { + SELECT * FROM t6 ORDER BY a ASC, b DESC; + } +} {1 one 4 four nosort} +do_test where-13.1 { + execsql { + CREATE TABLE t7(a INTEGER PRIMARY KEY, b TEXT); + INSERT INTO t7 VALUES(1,'one'); + INSERT INTO t7 VALUES(4,'four'); + CREATE INDEX t7i1 ON t7(b); + } + cksort { + SELECT * FROM t7 ORDER BY b; + } +} {4 four 1 one nosort} +do_test where-13.2 { + cksort { + SELECT * FROM t7 ORDER BY b, a; + } +} {4 four 1 one nosort} +do_test where-13.3 { + cksort { + SELECT * FROM t7 ORDER BY a; + } +} {1 one 4 four nosort} +do_test where-13.4 { + cksort { + SELECT * FROM t7 ORDER BY a, b; + } +} {1 one 4 four nosort} +do_test where-13.5 { + cksort { + SELECT * FROM t7 ORDER BY b DESC; + } +} {1 one 4 four nosort} +do_test where-13.6 { + cksort { + SELECT * FROM t7 ORDER BY b DESC, a DESC; + } +} {1 one 4 four nosort} +do_test where-13.7 { + cksort { + SELECT * FROM t7 ORDER BY b DESC, a ASC; + } +} {1 one 4 four sort} +do_test where-13.8 { + cksort { + SELECT * FROM t7 ORDER BY b ASC, a DESC; + } +} {4 four 1 one sort} +do_test where-13.9 { + cksort { + SELECT * FROM t7 ORDER BY a DESC; + } +} {4 four 1 one nosort} +do_test where-13.10 { + cksort { + SELECT * FROM t7 ORDER BY a DESC, b DESC; + } +} {4 four 1 one nosort} +do_test where-13.11 { + cksort { + SELECT * FROM t7 ORDER BY a DESC, b ASC; + } +} {4 four 1 one nosort} +do_test where-13.12 { + cksort { + SELECT * FROM t7 ORDER BY a ASC, b DESC; + } +} {1 one 4 four nosort} + +# Ticket #2211. +# +# When optimizing out ORDER BY clauses, make sure that trailing terms +# of the ORDER BY clause do not reference other tables in a join. +# +do_test where-14.1 { + execsql { + CREATE TABLE t8(a INTEGER PRIMARY KEY, b TEXT UNIQUE); + INSERT INTO t8 VALUES(1,'one'); + INSERT INTO t8 VALUES(4,'four'); + } + cksort { + SELECT x.a || '/' || y.a FROM t8 x, t8 y ORDER BY x.a, y.b + } +} {1/4 1/1 4/4 4/1 sort} +do_test where-14.2 { + cksort { + SELECT x.a || '/' || y.a FROM t8 x, t8 y ORDER BY x.a, y.b DESC + } +} {1/1 1/4 4/1 4/4 sort} +do_test where-14.3 { + cksort { + SELECT x.a || '/' || y.a FROM t8 x, t8 y ORDER BY x.a, x.b + } +} {1/1 1/4 4/1 4/4 nosort} +do_test where-14.4 { + cksort { + SELECT x.a || '/' || y.a FROM t8 x, t8 y ORDER BY x.a, x.b DESC + } +} {1/1 1/4 4/1 4/4 nosort} +do_test where-14.5 { + cksort { + SELECT x.a || '/' || y.a FROM t8 x, t8 y ORDER BY x.b, x.a||x.b + } +} {4/1 4/4 1/1 1/4 nosort} +do_test where-14.6 { + cksort { + SELECT x.a || '/' || y.a FROM t8 x, t8 y ORDER BY x.b, x.a||x.b DESC + } +} {4/1 4/4 1/1 1/4 nosort} +do_test where-14.7 { + cksort { + SELECT x.a || '/' || y.a FROM t8 x, t8 y ORDER BY x.b, y.a||y.b + } +} {4/1 4/4 1/1 1/4 sort} +do_test where-14.7.1 { + cksort { + SELECT x.a || '/' || y.a FROM t8 x, t8 y ORDER BY x.b, x.a, y.a||y.b + } +} {4/1 4/4 1/1 1/4 sort} +do_test where-14.7.2 { + cksort { + SELECT x.a || '/' || y.a FROM t8 x, t8 y ORDER BY x.b, x.a, x.a||x.b + } +} {4/1 4/4 1/1 1/4 nosort} +do_test where-14.8 { + cksort { + SELECT x.a || '/' || y.a FROM t8 x, t8 y ORDER BY x.b, y.a||y.b DESC + } +} {4/4 4/1 1/4 1/1 sort} +do_test where-14.9 { + cksort { + SELECT x.a || '/' || y.a FROM t8 x, t8 y ORDER BY x.b, x.a||y.b + } +} {4/4 4/1 1/4 1/1 sort} +do_test where-14.10 { + cksort { + SELECT x.a || '/' || y.a FROM t8 x, t8 y ORDER BY x.b, x.a||y.b DESC + } +} {4/1 4/4 1/1 1/4 sort} +do_test where-14.11 { + cksort { + SELECT x.a || '/' || y.a FROM t8 x, t8 y ORDER BY x.b, y.a||x.b + } +} {4/1 4/4 1/1 1/4 sort} +do_test where-14.12 { + cksort { + SELECT x.a || '/' || y.a FROM t8 x, t8 y ORDER BY x.b, y.a||x.b DESC + } +} {4/4 4/1 1/4 1/1 sort} + +# Ticket #2445. +# +# There was a crash that could occur when a where clause contains an +# alias for an expression in the result set, and that expression retrieves +# a column of the second or subsequent table in a join. +# +do_test where-15.1 { + execsql { + CREATE TEMP TABLE t1 (a, b, c, d, e); + CREATE TEMP TABLE t2 (f); + SELECT t1.e AS alias FROM t2, t1 WHERE alias = 1 ; + } +} {} + +# Ticket #3408. +# +# The branch of code in where.c that generated rowid lookups was +# incorrectly deallocating a constant register, meaning that if the +# vdbe code ran more than once, the second time around the constant +# value may have been clobbered by some other value. +# +do_test where-16.1 { + execsql { + CREATE TABLE a1(id INTEGER PRIMARY KEY, v); + CREATE TABLE a2(id INTEGER PRIMARY KEY, v); + INSERT INTO a1 VALUES(1, 'one'); + INSERT INTO a1 VALUES(2, 'two'); + INSERT INTO a2 VALUES(1, 'one'); + INSERT INTO a2 VALUES(2, 'two'); + } +} {} +do_test where-16.2 { + execsql { + SELECT * FROM a2 CROSS JOIN a1 WHERE a1.id=1 AND a1.v='one'; + } +} {1 one 1 one 2 two 1 one} + +# The actual problem reported in #3408. +do_test where-16.3 { + execsql { + CREATE TEMP TABLE foo(idx INTEGER); + INSERT INTO foo VALUES(1); + INSERT INTO foo VALUES(1); + INSERT INTO foo VALUES(1); + INSERT INTO foo VALUES(2); + INSERT INTO foo VALUES(2); + CREATE TEMP TABLE bar(stuff INTEGER); + INSERT INTO bar VALUES(100); + INSERT INTO bar VALUES(200); + INSERT INTO bar VALUES(300); + } +} {} +do_test where-16.4 { + execsql { + SELECT bar.RowID id FROM foo, bar WHERE foo.idx = bar.RowID AND id = 2; + } +} {2 2} + +integrity_check {where-99.0} + +#--------------------------------------------------------------------- +# These tests test that a bug surrounding the use of ForceInt has been +# fixed in where.c. +# +do_test where-17.1 { + execsql { + CREATE TABLE tbooking ( + id INTEGER PRIMARY KEY, + eventtype INTEGER NOT NULL + ); + INSERT INTO tbooking VALUES(42, 3); + INSERT INTO tbooking VALUES(43, 4); + } +} {} +do_test where-17.2 { + execsql { + SELECT a.id + FROM tbooking AS a + WHERE a.eventtype=3; + } +} {42} +do_test where-17.3 { + execsql { + SELECT a.id, (SELECT b.id FROM tbooking AS b WHERE b.id>a.id) + FROM tbooking AS a + WHERE a.eventtype=3; + } +} {42 43} +do_test where-17.4 { + execsql { + SELECT a.id, (SELECT b.id FROM tbooking AS b WHERE b.id>a.id) + FROM (SELECT 1.5 AS id) AS a + } +} {1.5 42} +do_test where-17.5 { + execsql { + CREATE TABLE tother(a, b); + INSERT INTO tother VALUES(1, 3.7); + SELECT id, a FROM tbooking, tother WHERE id>a; + } +} {42 1 43 1} + +finish_test -- cgit v1.2.3