summaryrefslogtreecommitdiff
path: root/test/select9.test
diff options
context:
space:
mode:
authorHans-Christoph Steiner <hans@eds.org>2012-03-30 20:42:12 -0400
committerHans-Christoph Steiner <hans@eds.org>2012-03-30 20:42:12 -0400
commit7bb481fda9ecb134804b49c2ce77ca28f7eea583 (patch)
tree31b520b9914d3e2453968abe375f2c102772c3dc /test/select9.test
Imported Upstream version 2.0.3
Diffstat (limited to 'test/select9.test')
-rw-r--r--test/select9.test419
1 files changed, 419 insertions, 0 deletions
diff --git a/test/select9.test b/test/select9.test
new file mode 100644
index 0000000..085dee0
--- /dev/null
+++ b/test/select9.test
@@ -0,0 +1,419 @@
+# 2008 June 24
+#
+# The author disclaims copyright to this source code. In place of
+# a legal notice, here is a blessing:
+#
+# May you do good and not evil.
+# May you find forgiveness for yourself and forgive others.
+# May you share freely, never taking more than you give.
+#
+#***********************************************************************
+# This file implements regression tests for SQLite library.
+#
+# $Id: select9.test,v 1.4 2008/07/01 14:39:35 danielk1977 Exp $
+
+# The tests in this file are focused on test compound SELECT statements
+# that have any or all of an ORDER BY, LIMIT or OFFSET clauses. As of
+# version 3.6.0, SQLite contains code to use SQL indexes where possible
+# to optimize such statements.
+#
+
+# TODO Points:
+#
+# * Are there any "column affinity" issues to consider?
+
+set testdir [file dirname $argv0]
+source $testdir/tester.tcl
+
+#-------------------------------------------------------------------------
+# test_compound_select TESTNAME SELECT RESULT
+#
+# This command is used to run multiple LIMIT/OFFSET test cases based on
+# the single SELECT statement passed as the second argument. The SELECT
+# statement may not contain a LIMIT or OFFSET clause. This proc tests
+# many statements of the form:
+#
+# "$SELECT limit $X offset $Y"
+#
+# for various values of $X and $Y.
+#
+# The third argument, $RESULT, should contain the expected result of
+# the command [execsql $SELECT].
+#
+# The first argument, $TESTNAME, is used as the base test case name to
+# pass to [do_test] for each individual LIMIT OFFSET test case.
+#
+proc test_compound_select {testname sql result} {
+
+ set nCol 1
+ db eval $sql A {
+ set nCol [llength $A(*)]
+ break
+ }
+ set nRow [expr {[llength $result] / $nCol}]
+
+ set ::compound_sql $sql
+ do_test $testname {
+ execsql $::compound_sql
+ } $result
+#return
+
+ set iLimitIncr 1
+ set iOffsetIncr 1
+ if {[info exists ::G(isquick)] && $::G(isquick) && $nRow>=5} {
+ set iOffsetIncr [expr $nRow / 5]
+ set iLimitIncr [expr $nRow / 5]
+ }
+
+ set iLimitEnd [expr $nRow+$iLimitIncr]
+ set iOffsetEnd [expr $nRow+$iOffsetIncr]
+
+ for {set iOffset 0} {$iOffset < $iOffsetEnd} {incr iOffset $iOffsetIncr} {
+ for {set iLimit 0} {$iLimit < $iLimitEnd} {incr iLimit} {
+
+ set ::compound_sql "$sql LIMIT $iLimit"
+ if {$iOffset != 0} {
+ append ::compound_sql " OFFSET $iOffset"
+ }
+
+ set iStart [expr {$iOffset*$nCol}]
+ set iEnd [expr {($iOffset*$nCol) + ($iLimit*$nCol) -1}]
+
+ do_test $testname.limit=$iLimit.offset=$iOffset {
+ execsql $::compound_sql
+ } [lrange $result $iStart $iEnd]
+ }
+ }
+}
+
+#-------------------------------------------------------------------------
+# test_compound_select_flippable TESTNAME SELECT RESULT
+#
+# This command is for testing statements of the form:
+#
+# <simple select 1> <compound op> <simple select 2> ORDER BY <order by>
+#
+# where each <simple select> is a simple (non-compound) select statement
+# and <compound op> is one of "INTERSECT", "UNION ALL" or "UNION".
+#
+# This proc calls [test_compound_select] twice, once with the select
+# statement as it is passed to this command, and once with the positions
+# of <select statement 1> and <select statement 2> exchanged.
+#
+proc test_compound_select_flippable {testname sql result} {
+ test_compound_select $testname $sql $result
+
+ set select [string trim $sql]
+ set RE {(.*)(UNION ALL|INTERSECT|UNION)(.*)(ORDER BY.*)}
+ set rc [regexp $RE $select -> s1 op s2 order_by]
+ if {!$rc} {error "Statement is unflippable: $select"}
+
+ set flipsql "$s2 $op $s1 $order_by"
+ test_compound_select $testname.flipped $flipsql $result
+}
+
+#############################################################################
+# Begin tests.
+#
+
+# Create and populate a sample database.
+#
+do_test select9-1.0 {
+ execsql {
+ CREATE TABLE t1(a, b, c);
+ CREATE TABLE t2(d, e, f);
+ BEGIN;
+ INSERT INTO t1 VALUES(1, 'one', 'I');
+ INSERT INTO t1 VALUES(3, NULL, NULL);
+ INSERT INTO t1 VALUES(5, 'five', 'V');
+ INSERT INTO t1 VALUES(7, 'seven', 'VII');
+ INSERT INTO t1 VALUES(9, NULL, NULL);
+ INSERT INTO t1 VALUES(2, 'two', 'II');
+ INSERT INTO t1 VALUES(4, 'four', 'IV');
+ INSERT INTO t1 VALUES(6, NULL, NULL);
+ INSERT INTO t1 VALUES(8, 'eight', 'VIII');
+ INSERT INTO t1 VALUES(10, 'ten', 'X');
+
+ INSERT INTO t2 VALUES(1, 'two', 'IV');
+ INSERT INTO t2 VALUES(2, 'four', 'VIII');
+ INSERT INTO t2 VALUES(3, NULL, NULL);
+ INSERT INTO t2 VALUES(4, 'eight', 'XVI');
+ INSERT INTO t2 VALUES(5, 'ten', 'XX');
+ INSERT INTO t2 VALUES(6, NULL, NULL);
+ INSERT INTO t2 VALUES(7, 'fourteen', 'XXVIII');
+ INSERT INTO t2 VALUES(8, 'sixteen', 'XXXII');
+ INSERT INTO t2 VALUES(9, NULL, NULL);
+ INSERT INTO t2 VALUES(10, 'twenty', 'XL');
+
+ COMMIT;
+ }
+} {}
+
+# Each iteration of this loop runs the same tests with a different set
+# of indexes present within the database schema. The data returned by
+# the compound SELECT statements in the test cases should be the same
+# in each case.
+#
+set iOuterLoop 1
+foreach indexes [list {
+ /* Do not create any indexes. */
+} {
+ CREATE INDEX i1 ON t1(a)
+} {
+ CREATE INDEX i2 ON t1(b)
+} {
+ CREATE INDEX i3 ON t2(d)
+} {
+ CREATE INDEX i4 ON t2(e)
+}] {
+
+ do_test select9-1.$iOuterLoop.1 {
+ execsql $indexes
+ } {}
+
+ # Test some 2-way UNION ALL queries. No WHERE clauses.
+ #
+ test_compound_select select9-1.$iOuterLoop.2 {
+ SELECT a, b FROM t1 UNION ALL SELECT d, e FROM t2
+ } {1 one 3 {} 5 five 7 seven 9 {} 2 two 4 four 6 {} 8 eight 10 ten 1 two 2 four 3 {} 4 eight 5 ten 6 {} 7 fourteen 8 sixteen 9 {} 10 twenty}
+ test_compound_select select9-1.$iOuterLoop.3 {
+ SELECT a, b FROM t1 UNION ALL SELECT d, e FROM t2 ORDER BY 1
+ } {1 one 1 two 2 two 2 four 3 {} 3 {} 4 four 4 eight 5 five 5 ten 6 {} 6 {} 7 seven 7 fourteen 8 eight 8 sixteen 9 {} 9 {} 10 ten 10 twenty}
+ test_compound_select select9-1.$iOuterLoop.4 {
+ SELECT a, b FROM t1 UNION ALL SELECT d, e FROM t2 ORDER BY 2
+ } {3 {} 9 {} 6 {} 3 {} 6 {} 9 {} 8 eight 4 eight 5 five 4 four 2 four 7 fourteen 1 one 7 seven 8 sixteen 10 ten 5 ten 10 twenty 2 two 1 two}
+ test_compound_select_flippable select9-1.$iOuterLoop.5 {
+ SELECT a, b FROM t1 UNION ALL SELECT d, e FROM t2 ORDER BY 1, 2
+ } {1 one 1 two 2 four 2 two 3 {} 3 {} 4 eight 4 four 5 five 5 ten 6 {} 6 {} 7 fourteen 7 seven 8 eight 8 sixteen 9 {} 9 {} 10 ten 10 twenty}
+ test_compound_select_flippable select9-1.$iOuterLoop.6 {
+ SELECT a, b FROM t1 UNION ALL SELECT d, e FROM t2 ORDER BY 2, 1
+ } {3 {} 3 {} 6 {} 6 {} 9 {} 9 {} 4 eight 8 eight 5 five 2 four 4 four 7 fourteen 1 one 7 seven 8 sixteen 5 ten 10 ten 10 twenty 1 two 2 two}
+
+ # Test some 2-way UNION queries.
+ #
+ test_compound_select select9-1.$iOuterLoop.7 {
+ SELECT a, b FROM t1 UNION SELECT d, e FROM t2
+ } {1 one 1 two 2 four 2 two 3 {} 4 eight 4 four 5 five 5 ten 6 {} 7 fourteen 7 seven 8 eight 8 sixteen 9 {} 10 ten 10 twenty}
+
+ test_compound_select select9-1.$iOuterLoop.8 {
+ SELECT a, b FROM t1 UNION SELECT d, e FROM t2 ORDER BY 1
+ } {1 one 1 two 2 four 2 two 3 {} 4 eight 4 four 5 five 5 ten 6 {} 7 fourteen 7 seven 8 eight 8 sixteen 9 {} 10 ten 10 twenty}
+
+ test_compound_select select9-1.$iOuterLoop.9 {
+ SELECT a, b FROM t1 UNION SELECT d, e FROM t2 ORDER BY 2
+ } {3 {} 6 {} 9 {} 4 eight 8 eight 5 five 2 four 4 four 7 fourteen 1 one 7 seven 8 sixteen 5 ten 10 ten 10 twenty 1 two 2 two}
+
+ test_compound_select_flippable select9-1.$iOuterLoop.10 {
+ SELECT a, b FROM t1 UNION SELECT d, e FROM t2 ORDER BY 1, 2
+ } {1 one 1 two 2 four 2 two 3 {} 4 eight 4 four 5 five 5 ten 6 {} 7 fourteen 7 seven 8 eight 8 sixteen 9 {} 10 ten 10 twenty}
+
+ test_compound_select_flippable select9-1.$iOuterLoop.11 {
+ SELECT a, b FROM t1 UNION SELECT d, e FROM t2 ORDER BY 2, 1
+ } {3 {} 6 {} 9 {} 4 eight 8 eight 5 five 2 four 4 four 7 fourteen 1 one 7 seven 8 sixteen 5 ten 10 ten 10 twenty 1 two 2 two}
+
+ # Test some 2-way INTERSECT queries.
+ #
+ test_compound_select select9-1.$iOuterLoop.11 {
+ SELECT a, b FROM t1 INTERSECT SELECT d, e FROM t2
+ } {3 {} 6 {} 9 {}}
+ test_compound_select_flippable select9-1.$iOuterLoop.12 {
+ SELECT a, b FROM t1 INTERSECT SELECT d, e FROM t2 ORDER BY 1
+ } {3 {} 6 {} 9 {}}
+ test_compound_select select9-1.$iOuterLoop.13 {
+ SELECT a, b FROM t1 INTERSECT SELECT d, e FROM t2 ORDER BY 2
+ } {3 {} 6 {} 9 {}}
+ test_compound_select_flippable select9-1.$iOuterLoop.14 {
+ SELECT a, b FROM t1 INTERSECT SELECT d, e FROM t2 ORDER BY 2, 1
+ } {3 {} 6 {} 9 {}}
+ test_compound_select_flippable select9-1.$iOuterLoop.15 {
+ SELECT a, b FROM t1 INTERSECT SELECT d, e FROM t2 ORDER BY 1, 2
+ } {3 {} 6 {} 9 {}}
+
+ # Test some 2-way EXCEPT queries.
+ #
+ test_compound_select select9-1.$iOuterLoop.16 {
+ SELECT a, b FROM t1 EXCEPT SELECT d, e FROM t2
+ } {1 one 2 two 4 four 5 five 7 seven 8 eight 10 ten}
+
+ test_compound_select select9-1.$iOuterLoop.17 {
+ SELECT a, b FROM t1 EXCEPT SELECT d, e FROM t2 ORDER BY 1
+ } {1 one 2 two 4 four 5 five 7 seven 8 eight 10 ten}
+
+ test_compound_select select9-1.$iOuterLoop.18 {
+ SELECT a, b FROM t1 EXCEPT SELECT d, e FROM t2 ORDER BY 2
+ } {8 eight 5 five 4 four 1 one 7 seven 10 ten 2 two}
+
+ test_compound_select select9-1.$iOuterLoop.19 {
+ SELECT a, b FROM t1 EXCEPT SELECT d, e FROM t2 ORDER BY 1, 2
+ } {1 one 2 two 4 four 5 five 7 seven 8 eight 10 ten}
+
+ test_compound_select select9-1.$iOuterLoop.20 {
+ SELECT a, b FROM t1 EXCEPT SELECT d, e FROM t2 ORDER BY 2, 1
+ } {8 eight 5 five 4 four 1 one 7 seven 10 ten 2 two}
+
+ incr iOuterLoop
+}
+
+do_test select9-2.0 {
+ execsql {
+ DROP INDEX i1;
+ DROP INDEX i2;
+ DROP INDEX i3;
+ DROP INDEX i4;
+ }
+} {}
+
+proc reverse {lhs rhs} {
+ return [string compare $rhs $lhs]
+}
+db collate reverse reverse
+
+# This loop is similar to the previous one (test cases select9-1.*)
+# except that the simple select statements have WHERE clauses attached
+# to them. Sometimes the WHERE clause may be satisfied using the same
+# index used for ORDER BY, sometimes not.
+#
+set iOuterLoop 1
+foreach indexes [list {
+ /* Do not create any indexes. */
+} {
+ CREATE INDEX i1 ON t1(a)
+} {
+ DROP INDEX i1;
+ CREATE INDEX i1 ON t1(b, a)
+} {
+ CREATE INDEX i2 ON t2(d DESC, e COLLATE REVERSE ASC);
+} {
+ CREATE INDEX i3 ON t1(a DESC);
+}] {
+ do_test select9-2.$iOuterLoop.1 {
+ execsql $indexes
+ } {}
+
+ test_compound_select_flippable select9-2.$iOuterLoop.2 {
+ SELECT * FROM t1 WHERE a<5 UNION SELECT * FROM t2 WHERE d>=5 ORDER BY 1
+ } {1 one I 2 two II 3 {} {} 4 four IV 5 ten XX 6 {} {} 7 fourteen XXVIII 8 sixteen XXXII 9 {} {} 10 twenty XL}
+
+ test_compound_select_flippable select9-2.$iOuterLoop.2 {
+ SELECT * FROM t1 WHERE a<5 UNION SELECT * FROM t2 WHERE d>=5 ORDER BY 2, 1
+ } {3 {} {} 6 {} {} 9 {} {} 4 four IV 7 fourteen XXVIII 1 one I 8 sixteen XXXII 5 ten XX 10 twenty XL 2 two II}
+
+ test_compound_select_flippable select9-2.$iOuterLoop.3 {
+ SELECT * FROM t1 WHERE a<5 UNION SELECT * FROM t2 WHERE d>=5
+ ORDER BY 2 COLLATE reverse, 1
+ } {3 {} {} 6 {} {} 9 {} {} 2 two II 10 twenty XL 5 ten XX 8 sixteen XXXII 1 one I 7 fourteen XXVIII 4 four IV}
+
+ test_compound_select_flippable select9-2.$iOuterLoop.4 {
+ SELECT * FROM t1 WHERE a<5 UNION ALL SELECT * FROM t2 WHERE d>=5 ORDER BY 1
+ } {1 one I 2 two II 3 {} {} 4 four IV 5 ten XX 6 {} {} 7 fourteen XXVIII 8 sixteen XXXII 9 {} {} 10 twenty XL}
+
+ test_compound_select_flippable select9-2.$iOuterLoop.5 {
+ SELECT * FROM t1 WHERE a<5 UNION ALL SELECT * FROM t2 WHERE d>=5 ORDER BY 2, 1
+ } {3 {} {} 6 {} {} 9 {} {} 4 four IV 7 fourteen XXVIII 1 one I 8 sixteen XXXII 5 ten XX 10 twenty XL 2 two II}
+
+ test_compound_select_flippable select9-2.$iOuterLoop.6 {
+ SELECT * FROM t1 WHERE a<5 UNION ALL SELECT * FROM t2 WHERE d>=5
+ ORDER BY 2 COLLATE reverse, 1
+ } {3 {} {} 6 {} {} 9 {} {} 2 two II 10 twenty XL 5 ten XX 8 sixteen XXXII 1 one I 7 fourteen XXVIII 4 four IV}
+
+ test_compound_select select9-2.$iOuterLoop.4 {
+ SELECT a FROM t1 WHERE a<8 EXCEPT SELECT d FROM t2 WHERE d<=3 ORDER BY 1
+ } {4 5 6 7}
+
+ test_compound_select select9-2.$iOuterLoop.4 {
+ SELECT a FROM t1 WHERE a<8 INTERSECT SELECT d FROM t2 WHERE d<=3 ORDER BY 1
+ } {1 2 3}
+
+}
+
+do_test select9-2.X {
+ execsql {
+ DROP INDEX i1;
+ DROP INDEX i2;
+ DROP INDEX i3;
+ }
+} {}
+
+# This procedure executes the SQL. Then it checks the generated program
+# for the SQL and appends a "nosort" to the result if the program contains the
+# SortCallback opcode. If the program does not contain the SortCallback
+# opcode it appends "sort"
+#
+proc cksort {sql} {
+ set ::sqlite_sort_count 0
+ set data [execsql $sql]
+ if {$::sqlite_sort_count} {set x sort} {set x nosort}
+ lappend data $x
+ return $data
+}
+
+# If the right indexes exist, the following query:
+#
+# SELECT t1.a FROM t1 UNION ALL SELECT t2.d FROM t2 ORDER BY 1
+#
+# can use indexes to run without doing a in-memory sort operation.
+# This block of tests (select9-3.*) is used to check if the same
+# is possible with:
+#
+# CREATE VIEW v1 AS SELECT a FROM t1 UNION ALL SELECT d FROM t2
+# SELECT a FROM v1 ORDER BY 1
+#
+# It turns out that it is.
+#
+do_test select9-3.1 {
+ cksort { SELECT a FROM t1 ORDER BY 1 }
+} {1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 sort}
+do_test select9-3.2 {
+ execsql { CREATE INDEX i1 ON t1(a) }
+ cksort { SELECT a FROM t1 ORDER BY 1 }
+} {1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 nosort}
+do_test select9-3.3 {
+ cksort { SELECT a FROM t1 UNION ALL SELECT d FROM t2 ORDER BY 1 LIMIT 5 }
+} {1 1 2 2 3 sort}
+do_test select9-3.4 {
+ execsql { CREATE INDEX i2 ON t2(d) }
+ cksort { SELECT a FROM t1 UNION ALL SELECT d FROM t2 ORDER BY 1 LIMIT 5 }
+} {1 1 2 2 3 nosort}
+do_test select9-3.5 {
+ execsql { CREATE VIEW v1 AS SELECT a FROM t1 UNION ALL SELECT d FROM t2 }
+ cksort { SELECT a FROM v1 ORDER BY 1 LIMIT 5 }
+} {1 1 2 2 3 nosort}
+do_test select9-3.X {
+ execsql {
+ DROP INDEX i1;
+ DROP INDEX i2;
+ DROP VIEW v1;
+ }
+} {}
+
+# This block of tests is the same as the preceding one, except that
+# "UNION" is tested instead of "UNION ALL".
+#
+do_test select9-4.1 {
+ cksort { SELECT a FROM t1 ORDER BY 1 }
+} {1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 sort}
+do_test select9-4.2 {
+ execsql { CREATE INDEX i1 ON t1(a) }
+ cksort { SELECT a FROM t1 ORDER BY 1 }
+} {1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 nosort}
+do_test select9-4.3 {
+ cksort { SELECT a FROM t1 UNION SELECT d FROM t2 ORDER BY 1 LIMIT 5 }
+} {1 2 3 4 5 sort}
+do_test select9-4.4 {
+ execsql { CREATE INDEX i2 ON t2(d) }
+ cksort { SELECT a FROM t1 UNION SELECT d FROM t2 ORDER BY 1 LIMIT 5 }
+} {1 2 3 4 5 nosort}
+do_test select9-4.5 {
+ execsql { CREATE VIEW v1 AS SELECT a FROM t1 UNION SELECT d FROM t2 }
+ cksort { SELECT a FROM v1 ORDER BY 1 LIMIT 5 }
+} {1 2 3 4 5 sort}
+do_test select9-4.X {
+ execsql {
+ DROP INDEX i1;
+ DROP INDEX i2;
+ DROP VIEW v1;
+ }
+} {}
+
+
+finish_test