From 01eaca2a16316adf91803a1c43803c85733183ea Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: Victor Shyba Date: Mon, 7 Aug 2017 21:10:15 -0300 Subject: [tests] use assert_has_calls instead of has_calls --- testing/tests/client/test_incoming_processing_flow.py | 4 ++-- 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-) diff --git a/testing/tests/client/test_incoming_processing_flow.py b/testing/tests/client/test_incoming_processing_flow.py index 40409f0a..7bc1e3c6 100644 --- a/testing/tests/client/test_incoming_processing_flow.py +++ b/testing/tests/client/test_incoming_processing_flow.py @@ -131,7 +131,7 @@ class IncomingBoxProcessingTestCase(unittest.TestCase): consumer = GoodConsumer() self.loop.add_consumer(consumer) yield self.loop() - self.box.set_processed.has_calls([call(x) for x in items]) + self.box.set_processed.assert_has_calls([call(x) for x in items]) @defer.inlineCallbacks def test_good_consumer_deletes_items(self): @@ -140,7 +140,7 @@ class IncomingBoxProcessingTestCase(unittest.TestCase): consumer = GoodConsumer() self.loop.add_consumer(consumer) yield self.loop() - self.box.delete.has_calls([call(x) for x in items]) + self.box.delete.assert_has_calls([call(x) for x in items]) @defer.inlineCallbacks def test_processing_failed_doesnt_mark_as_processed(self): -- cgit v1.2.3