| Age | Commit message (Collapse) | Author |
|---|
|
|
|
Without this patch applied the file_line autorequire examples are
failing. This is a problem because the failures are false positives and
should be passing given the implementation.
This patch fixes the problem by changing the examples to directly test
the existence of the relationship by finding it in the list of
autorequire relationships.
|
|
If we manage a file we edit with file_line, it should be autorequired by
file_line. Without this patch applied the relationship is not
automatically setup and the user is forced to manually manage the
relationship.
|
|
This commit adds a new parameter called "match"
to the file_line resource type, and support for
this new parameter to the corresponding ruby
provider.
This parameter is optional; file_line should work
just as before if you do not specify this parameter...
so this change should be backwards-compatible.
If you do specify the parameter, it is treated
as a regular expression that should be used when
looking through the file for a line. This allows
you to do things like find a line that begins with
a certain prefix (e.g., "foo=.*"), and *replace*
the existing line with the line you specify in your
"line" parameter. Without this capability, if you
already had a line "foo=bar" in your file and your
"line" parameter was set to "foo=baz", you'd end up
with *both* lines in the final file. In many cases
this is undesirable.
|
|
The examples in the file_line resource documentation state the following
resource should work:
file_line { 'sudo_rule':
path => '/etc/sudoers',
line => '%sudo ALL=(ALL) ALL',
}
Without this patch the example does not work because ensure is not set
to present.
This patch fixes the problem by setting the default value of ensure to
present.
|
|
This just changes the instance variables to a memoized let block and
gets ride of the before :each block.
The patch has no change in behavior.
|
|
Without this patch the resource whole_line would be included in the
stable stdlib module shipping in PE 1.2. Ideally the name will be
stable and unchanging in the future.
There was quite a bit of concern over whole_line being an unwise name.
file_line appears to be the most suitable name and least likely to need
another rename in the future.
|
