| Age | Commit message (Collapse) | Author |
|---|
|
In some situations, the log directory for unattended-upgrades might not
exist. In those cases, packages will not get upgraded!
unattended-upgrades crashes with a python backtrace because the log dir
is not present.
|
|
Micah found an issue with usage of config_content: if you call template('...')
yourself and pass that on to config_content, then your template gets evaluated
without all of the variables. This means that you don't hava access to
blacklisted_packages, mail_recipient or mailonlyonerror.
To make it possible to use a different template while still having access to
those variables, let's make it possible to change the template name that we're
using.
|
|
unattended-upgrades is run on a daily base by cron, no need to force
an `apt-get update` after changing this file.
|
|
unattended-upgrades is installed
|
|
This functionality was lost because we stopped using a source file for
the 50unattended-upgrades file that would previously let one override
the configuration per release or per host.
|
|
|
|
This combines all files into one template. It should make maintenance
easier.
|
|
|
|
This gets us fixes for the unattended_upgrades in wheezy, as well as the custom_key_dir class parameter replacement of the global variable
Conflicts:
manifests/unattended_upgrades.pp
|
|
|
|
|
|
unattended_upgrades.pp
|
|
Before, including apt::unattended_upgrades on a host without
the unattended-upgrades package would fail on the first run,
because the module tries to install the package before apt is
finally configured.
This commit does:
- introduce the option $refresh_apt for apt::apt_conf
(Defaults to true). Can be used to not trigger Exec['refresh_apt']
- install the unattended-upgrades package after a final
Exec['refresh_apt']. To not run into a loop, it calls
Apt_conf['50unattended-upgrades'] with the option
refresh_apt => false, which is also not needed for the configuration
|
|
Conflicts:
files/lenny/50unattended-upgrades
|
|
|
|
Signed-off-by: Gabriel Filion <lelutin@gmail.com>
+ more linting by intrigeri.
Conflicts:
manifests/apticron.pp
manifests/cron/dist_upgrade.pp
manifests/cron/download.pp
manifests/dist_upgrade/initiator.pp
manifests/init.pp
manifests/listchanges.pp
manifests/preferences.pp
manifests/preseeded_package.pp
manifests/proxy_client.pp
manifests/unattended_upgrades.pp
manifests/update.pp
|
|
In newer puppet releases the old way to name class/modules with a -,
won't anymore be supported.
Conflicts:
manifests/unattended_upgrades.pp
|
|
|
|
In newer puppet releases the old way to name class/modules with a -,
won't anymore be supported.
|
|
|
|
|
|
as we use $lsbdistcodename as source we cannot name the sources
which should be used to update "stable". -> Fix it by deploying
a per lsbdistcodename configfile. This can also be used as a pre-
work for the #2681 shared modules bug.
|
|
|
|
|
|
Currently, setting the $custom_preferences variable to false fails
because of the /etc/apt/preferences concatenated_file being re-defined.
Fix this by setting dependencies on the resource only when we expect to
create the /etc/apt/preferences file. Also, since there is no "ensure"
parameter to concatenated_file, use a simple file resource to ensure
that it is removed.
Signed-off-by: Gabriel Filion <lelutin@gmail.com>
|
|
remove the use of _snippet in names (except for preferences_snippet) so
that they represent directly a resource name.
rename custom_sources_template to sources_list.
modify sources_list to make it more flexible (gives the opportunity to
provide sources or content). this changes its behaviour in that the name
is now the name of the file in sources.list.d
rename proxy-client to proxy_client to use the same standard for its
name as the other classes.
Signed-off-by: Gabriel Filion <lelutin@gmail.com>
|
|
With the new define, it's easy to add an apt.conf snippet in apt.conf.d
It accepts either 'sources' to get a static file or 'content' to define
content inline or with the help of a template.
Put it to use where we create files in apt.conf.d
Finally, fix the dependancy to the apt_config file (however, I don't see
the need for this dependancy)
Signed-off-by: Gabriel Filion <lelutin@gmail.com>
|
|
|
|
Now, we have the possibility to externally add snippes, so that
we can preferences for packages that are for example only in backports
or unstable.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
