summaryrefslogtreecommitdiff
path: root/main/openssl/crypto/des/times/usparc.cc
diff options
context:
space:
mode:
authorArne Schwabe <arne@rfc2549.org>2015-04-15 00:17:26 +0200
committerArne Schwabe <arne@rfc2549.org>2015-04-15 00:20:23 +0200
commitc3ae4aaac9f0b168aed063d3e86c5196608eaba1 (patch)
tree1a18e7d8751d4dd3682d82d12c8441b335112984 /main/openssl/crypto/des/times/usparc.cc
parent5e42114d22faefe7c272b1b498fdf5640da494c7 (diff)
Move more to git, add submodules, fix build script, change hgignore to gitignore
Diffstat (limited to 'main/openssl/crypto/des/times/usparc.cc')
m---------main/openssl0
-rw-r--r--main/openssl/crypto/des/times/usparc.cc31
2 files changed, 0 insertions, 31 deletions
diff --git a/main/openssl b/main/openssl
new file mode 160000
+Subproject 4d377a9ce111930d8a8f06dc0e94a892a7f6c51
diff --git a/main/openssl/crypto/des/times/usparc.cc b/main/openssl/crypto/des/times/usparc.cc
deleted file mode 100644
index 0864285e..00000000
--- a/main/openssl/crypto/des/times/usparc.cc
+++ /dev/null
@@ -1,31 +0,0 @@
-solaris 2.5.1 usparc 167mhz?? - SC4.0 cc -fast -Xa -xO5
-
-For the ultra sparc, SunC 4.0 cc -fast -Xa -xO5, running 'des_opts'
-gives a speed of 475,000 des/s while 'speed' gives 417,000 des/s.
-I believe the difference is tied up in optimisation that the compiler
-is able to perform when the code is 'inlined'. For 'speed', the DES
-routines are being linked from a library. I'll record the higher
-speed since if performance is everything, you can always inline
-'des_enc.c'.
-
-[ 16-Jan-06 - I've been playing with the
- '-xtarget=ultra -xarch=v8plus -Xa -xO5 -Xa'
- and while it makes the des_opts numbers much slower, it makes the
- actual 'speed' numbers look better which is a realistic version of
- using the libraries. ]
-
-options des ecb/s
-16 r1 p 475516.90 100.0%
-16 r2 p 439388.10 92.4%
-16 c i 427001.40 89.8%
-16 c p 419516.50 88.2%
- 4 r2 p 409491.70 86.1%
- 4 r1 p 404266.90 85.0%
- 4 c p 398121.00 83.7%
- 4 c i 370588.40 77.9%
- 4 r1 i 362742.20 76.3%
-16 r2 i 331275.50 69.7%
-16 r1 i 324730.60 68.3%
- 4 r2 i 63535.10 13.4% <-- very very weird, must be cache problems.
--DDES_UNROLL -DDES_RISC1 -DDES_PTR
-