From 0827cb483ef4cf74123313e8f2d0d2bd5ce8e46b Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: Robert Newson Date: Mon, 20 Jun 2011 21:22:02 +0000 Subject: Fix spurious declarations of new merge conflicts This patch also adds extra tests of the key tree merging logic as well as edoc-formatted documentation for the module and a few of the merge functions. Closes COUCHDB-902. Thanks Paul Davis, Bob Dionne, Klaus Trainer. backported from trunk@1065471 Conflicts: src/couchdb/couch_key_tree.erl git-svn-id: https://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/couchdb/branches/1.1.x@1137789 13f79535-47bb-0310-9956-ffa450edef68 --- test/etap/060-kt-merging.t | 95 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++--------- 1 file changed, 78 insertions(+), 17 deletions(-) (limited to 'test') diff --git a/test/etap/060-kt-merging.t b/test/etap/060-kt-merging.t index 0e481a52..efbdbf69 100755 --- a/test/etap/060-kt-merging.t +++ b/test/etap/060-kt-merging.t @@ -15,7 +15,7 @@ main(_) -> test_util:init_code_path(), - etap:plan(12), + etap:plan(16), case (catch test()) of ok -> etap:end_tests(); @@ -26,25 +26,21 @@ main(_) -> ok. test() -> - One = {0, {"1","foo",[]}}, - TwoSibs = [{0, {"1","foo",[]}}, - {0, {"2","foo",[]}}], - OneChild = {0, {"1","foo",[{"1a", "bar", []}]}}, - TwoChild = {0, {"1","foo", [{"1a", "bar", [{"1aa", "bar", []}]}]}}, - TwoChildSibs = {0, {"1","foo", [{"1a", "bar", []}, - {"1b", "bar", []}]}}, - TwoChildSibs2 = {0, {"1","foo", [{"1a", "bar", []}, - {"1b", "bar", [{"1bb", "boo", []}]}]}}, - Stemmed1b = {1, {"1a", "bar", []}}, - Stemmed1a = {1, {"1a", "bar", [{"1aa", "bar", []}]}}, - Stemmed1aa = {2, {"1aa", "bar", []}}, - Stemmed1bb = {2, {"1bb", "boo", []}}, + One = {1, {"1","foo",[]}}, etap:is( {[One], no_conflicts}, couch_key_tree:merge([], One, 10), "The empty tree is the identity for merge." ), + etap:is( + {[One], no_conflicts}, + couch_key_tree:merge([One], One, 10), + "Merging is reflexive." + ), + + TwoSibs = [{1, {"1","foo",[]}}, + {1, {"2","foo",[]}}], etap:is( {TwoSibs, no_conflicts}, @@ -52,41 +48,75 @@ test() -> "Merging a prefix of a tree with the tree yields the tree." ), + Three = {1, {"3","foo",[]}}, + ThreeSibs = [{1, {"1","foo",[]}}, + {1, {"2","foo",[]}}, + {1, {"3","foo",[]}}], + etap:is( - {[One], no_conflicts}, - couch_key_tree:merge([One], One, 10), - "Merging is reflexive." + {ThreeSibs, conflicts}, + couch_key_tree:merge(TwoSibs, Three, 10), + "Merging a third unrelated branch leads to a conflict." ), + + TwoChild = {1, {"1","foo", [{"1a", "bar", [{"1aa", "bar", []}]}]}}, + etap:is( {[TwoChild], no_conflicts}, couch_key_tree:merge([TwoChild], TwoChild, 10), "Merging two children is still reflexive." ), + TwoChildSibs = {1, {"1","foo", [{"1a", "bar", []}, + {"1b", "bar", []}]}}, etap:is( {[TwoChildSibs], no_conflicts}, couch_key_tree:merge([TwoChildSibs], TwoChildSibs, 10), "Merging a tree to itself is itself."), + TwoChildPlusSibs = + {1, {"1","foo", [{"1a", "bar", [{"1aa", "bar", []}]}, + {"1b", "bar", []}]}}, + + etap:is( + {[TwoChildPlusSibs], no_conflicts}, + couch_key_tree:merge([TwoChild], TwoChildSibs, 10), + "Merging tree of uneven length at node 2."), + + Stemmed1b = {2, {"1a", "bar", []}}, etap:is( {[TwoChildSibs], no_conflicts}, couch_key_tree:merge([TwoChildSibs], Stemmed1b, 10), "Merging a tree with a stem." ), + TwoChildSibs2 = {1, {"1","foo", [{"1a", "bar", []}, + {"1b", "bar", [{"1bb", "boo", []}]}]}}, + Stemmed1bb = {3, {"1bb", "boo", []}}, etap:is( {[TwoChildSibs2], no_conflicts}, couch_key_tree:merge([TwoChildSibs2], Stemmed1bb, 10), "Merging a stem at a deeper level." ), + StemmedTwoChildSibs2 = [{2,{"1a", "bar", []}}, + {2,{"1b", "bar", [{"1bb", "boo", []}]}}], + + etap:is( + {StemmedTwoChildSibs2, no_conflicts}, + couch_key_tree:merge(StemmedTwoChildSibs2, Stemmed1bb, 10), + "Merging a stem at a deeper level against paths at deeper levels." + ), + + Stemmed1aa = {3, {"1aa", "bar", []}}, etap:is( {[TwoChild], no_conflicts}, couch_key_tree:merge([TwoChild], Stemmed1aa, 10), "Merging a single tree with a deeper stem." ), + Stemmed1a = {2, {"1a", "bar", [{"1aa", "bar", []}]}}, etap:is( {[TwoChild], no_conflicts}, couch_key_tree:merge([TwoChild], Stemmed1a, 10), @@ -99,6 +129,7 @@ test() -> "More merging." ), + OneChild = {1, {"1","foo",[{"1a", "bar", []}]}}, Expect1 = [OneChild, Stemmed1aa], etap:is( {Expect1, conflicts}, @@ -112,4 +143,34 @@ test() -> "Merge should have no conflicts." ), + %% this test is based on couch-902-test-case2.py + %% foo has conflicts from replication at depth two + %% foo3 is the current value + Foo = {1, {"foo", + "val1", + [{"foo2","val2",[]}, + {"foo3", "val3", []} + ]}}, + %% foo now has an attachment added, which leads to foo4 and val4 + %% off foo3 + Bar = {1, {"foo", + [], + [{"foo3", + [], + [{"foo4","val4",[]} + ]}]}}, + %% this is what the merge returns + %% note that it ignore the conflicting branch as there's no match + FooBar = {1, {"foo", + "val1", + [{"foo2","val2",[]}, + {"foo3", "val3", [{"foo4","val4",[]}]} + ]}}, + + etap:is( + {[FooBar], no_conflicts}, + couch_key_tree:merge([Foo],Bar,10), + "Merging trees with conflicts ought to behave." + ), + ok. -- cgit v1.2.3