From fb68d7f9047e88e9c5bfb5dd1c74a62e7c3c77b4 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: Kali Kaneko Date: Thu, 5 Mar 2015 12:26:51 -0400 Subject: [doc] Remove unneded comment about collection refs This concern is addressed by the following mail pullreq, that will be into 0.4.0 release: https://github.com/leapcode/leap_mail/pull/175 By the way, it is really funny that I cannot tell if this comment was written by meskio, as the blame says, or if I was the original author of the remark. I should stop drinking so much coffee. --- src/leap/bitmask/services/mail/imap.py | 5 ----- 1 file changed, 5 deletions(-) (limited to 'src/leap/bitmask/services/mail') diff --git a/src/leap/bitmask/services/mail/imap.py b/src/leap/bitmask/services/mail/imap.py index da753a0b..30646a63 100644 --- a/src/leap/bitmask/services/mail/imap.py +++ b/src/leap/bitmask/services/mail/imap.py @@ -93,11 +93,6 @@ def start_incoming_mail_service(keymanager, soledad, imap_factory, userid): # the account, and passing the mailbox to the incoming service. # In an even better world, we just would subscribe to a channel that would # pass us the serialized object to be inserted. - # XXX: I think we might be at risk here because the account top object - # currently just returns as many mailbox objects as it's asked for, so - # we should be careful about concurrent operations (ie, maybe just use - # this one to do inserts, or let account have an in-memory map of - # mailboxes, and just return references to them). acc = imap_factory.theAccount d = acc.callWhenReady(lambda _: acc.getMailbox(INBOX_NAME)) d.addCallback(setUpIncomingMail) -- cgit v1.2.3