diff options
author | Kali Kaneko <kali@leap.se> | 2015-03-05 12:26:51 -0400 |
---|---|---|
committer | Ruben Pollan <meskio@sindominio.net> | 2015-03-10 19:00:46 +0100 |
commit | fb68d7f9047e88e9c5bfb5dd1c74a62e7c3c77b4 (patch) | |
tree | 53fdcc1bd7ead77698fd836fe7d6ac3b5b42e060 | |
parent | e59e47675e92115f6c98b13cae518ede22e935eb (diff) |
[doc] Remove unneded comment about collection refs
This concern is addressed by the following mail pullreq, that will be
into 0.4.0 release:
https://github.com/leapcode/leap_mail/pull/175
By the way, it is really funny that I cannot tell if this comment was
written by meskio, as the blame says, or if I was the original author of
the remark. I should stop drinking so much coffee.
-rw-r--r-- | src/leap/bitmask/services/mail/imap.py | 5 |
1 files changed, 0 insertions, 5 deletions
diff --git a/src/leap/bitmask/services/mail/imap.py b/src/leap/bitmask/services/mail/imap.py index da753a0b..30646a63 100644 --- a/src/leap/bitmask/services/mail/imap.py +++ b/src/leap/bitmask/services/mail/imap.py @@ -93,11 +93,6 @@ def start_incoming_mail_service(keymanager, soledad, imap_factory, userid): # the account, and passing the mailbox to the incoming service. # In an even better world, we just would subscribe to a channel that would # pass us the serialized object to be inserted. - # XXX: I think we might be at risk here because the account top object - # currently just returns as many mailbox objects as it's asked for, so - # we should be careful about concurrent operations (ie, maybe just use - # this one to do inserts, or let account have an in-memory map of - # mailboxes, and just return references to them). acc = imap_factory.theAccount d = acc.callWhenReady(lambda _: acc.getMailbox(INBOX_NAME)) d.addCallback(setUpIncomingMail) |