From 1684c8f398922065a97e7da4dac4ac6a33cc5218 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: =?UTF-8?q?Parm=C3=A9nides=20GV?= Date: Wed, 9 Apr 2014 16:03:55 +0200 Subject: Back to the standard "app" module. This return to "app" instead of "bitmask_android" is due to this reading: https://developer.android.com/sdk/installing/studio-build.html#projectStructure I'll have to tweak the final apk name in build.gradle. --- app/openssl/crypto/rc4/asm/rc4-x86_64.pl | 504 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++ 1 file changed, 504 insertions(+) create mode 100755 app/openssl/crypto/rc4/asm/rc4-x86_64.pl (limited to 'app/openssl/crypto/rc4/asm/rc4-x86_64.pl') diff --git a/app/openssl/crypto/rc4/asm/rc4-x86_64.pl b/app/openssl/crypto/rc4/asm/rc4-x86_64.pl new file mode 100755 index 00000000..677be5fe --- /dev/null +++ b/app/openssl/crypto/rc4/asm/rc4-x86_64.pl @@ -0,0 +1,504 @@ +#!/usr/bin/env perl +# +# ==================================================================== +# Written by Andy Polyakov for the OpenSSL +# project. The module is, however, dual licensed under OpenSSL and +# CRYPTOGAMS licenses depending on where you obtain it. For further +# details see http://www.openssl.org/~appro/cryptogams/. +# ==================================================================== +# +# 2.22x RC4 tune-up:-) It should be noted though that my hand [as in +# "hand-coded assembler"] doesn't stand for the whole improvement +# coefficient. It turned out that eliminating RC4_CHAR from config +# line results in ~40% improvement (yes, even for C implementation). +# Presumably it has everything to do with AMD cache architecture and +# RAW or whatever penalties. Once again! The module *requires* config +# line *without* RC4_CHAR! As for coding "secret," I bet on partial +# register arithmetics. For example instead of 'inc %r8; and $255,%r8' +# I simply 'inc %r8b'. Even though optimization manual discourages +# to operate on partial registers, it turned out to be the best bet. +# At least for AMD... How IA32E would perform remains to be seen... + +# As was shown by Marc Bevand reordering of couple of load operations +# results in even higher performance gain of 3.3x:-) At least on +# Opteron... For reference, 1x in this case is RC4_CHAR C-code +# compiled with gcc 3.3.2, which performs at ~54MBps per 1GHz clock. +# Latter means that if you want to *estimate* what to expect from +# *your* Opteron, then multiply 54 by 3.3 and clock frequency in GHz. + +# Intel P4 EM64T core was found to run the AMD64 code really slow... +# The only way to achieve comparable performance on P4 was to keep +# RC4_CHAR. Kind of ironic, huh? As it's apparently impossible to +# compose blended code, which would perform even within 30% marginal +# on either AMD and Intel platforms, I implement both cases. See +# rc4_skey.c for further details... + +# P4 EM64T core appears to be "allergic" to 64-bit inc/dec. Replacing +# those with add/sub results in 50% performance improvement of folded +# loop... + +# As was shown by Zou Nanhai loop unrolling can improve Intel EM64T +# performance by >30% [unlike P4 32-bit case that is]. But this is +# provided that loads are reordered even more aggressively! Both code +# pathes, AMD64 and EM64T, reorder loads in essentially same manner +# as my IA-64 implementation. On Opteron this resulted in modest 5% +# improvement [I had to test it], while final Intel P4 performance +# achieves respectful 432MBps on 2.8GHz processor now. For reference. +# If executed on Xeon, current RC4_CHAR code-path is 2.7x faster than +# RC4_INT code-path. While if executed on Opteron, it's only 25% +# slower than the RC4_INT one [meaning that if CPU µ-arch detection +# is not implemented, then this final RC4_CHAR code-path should be +# preferred, as it provides better *all-round* performance]. + +# Intel Core2 was observed to perform poorly on both code paths:-( It +# apparently suffers from some kind of partial register stall, which +# occurs in 64-bit mode only [as virtually identical 32-bit loop was +# observed to outperform 64-bit one by almost 50%]. Adding two movzb to +# cloop1 boosts its performance by 80%! This loop appears to be optimal +# fit for Core2 and therefore the code was modified to skip cloop8 on +# this CPU. + +$flavour = shift; +$output = shift; +if ($flavour =~ /\./) { $output = $flavour; undef $flavour; } + +$win64=0; $win64=1 if ($flavour =~ /[nm]asm|mingw64/ || $output =~ /\.asm$/); + +$0 =~ m/(.*[\/\\])[^\/\\]+$/; $dir=$1; +( $xlate="${dir}x86_64-xlate.pl" and -f $xlate ) or +( $xlate="${dir}../../perlasm/x86_64-xlate.pl" and -f $xlate) or +die "can't locate x86_64-xlate.pl"; + +open STDOUT,"| $^X $xlate $flavour $output"; + +$dat="%rdi"; # arg1 +$len="%rsi"; # arg2 +$inp="%rdx"; # arg3 +$out="%rcx"; # arg4 + +@XX=("%r8","%r10"); +@TX=("%r9","%r11"); +$YY="%r12"; +$TY="%r13"; + +$code=<<___; +.text + +.globl RC4 +.type RC4,\@function,4 +.align 16 +RC4: or $len,$len + jne .Lentry + ret +.Lentry: + push %rbx + push %r12 + push %r13 +.Lprologue: + + add \$8,$dat + movl -8($dat),$XX[0]#d + movl -4($dat),$YY#d + cmpl \$-1,256($dat) + je .LRC4_CHAR + inc $XX[0]#b + movl ($dat,$XX[0],4),$TX[0]#d + test \$-8,$len + jz .Lloop1 + jmp .Lloop8 +.align 16 +.Lloop8: +___ +for ($i=0;$i<8;$i++) { +$code.=<<___; + add $TX[0]#b,$YY#b + mov $XX[0],$XX[1] + movl ($dat,$YY,4),$TY#d + ror \$8,%rax # ror is redundant when $i=0 + inc $XX[1]#b + movl ($dat,$XX[1],4),$TX[1]#d + cmp $XX[1],$YY + movl $TX[0]#d,($dat,$YY,4) + cmove $TX[0],$TX[1] + movl $TY#d,($dat,$XX[0],4) + add $TX[0]#b,$TY#b + movb ($dat,$TY,4),%al +___ +push(@TX,shift(@TX)); push(@XX,shift(@XX)); # "rotate" registers +} +$code.=<<___; + ror \$8,%rax + sub \$8,$len + + xor ($inp),%rax + add \$8,$inp + mov %rax,($out) + add \$8,$out + + test \$-8,$len + jnz .Lloop8 + cmp \$0,$len + jne .Lloop1 + jmp .Lexit + +.align 16 +.Lloop1: + add $TX[0]#b,$YY#b + movl ($dat,$YY,4),$TY#d + movl $TX[0]#d,($dat,$YY,4) + movl $TY#d,($dat,$XX[0],4) + add $TY#b,$TX[0]#b + inc $XX[0]#b + movl ($dat,$TX[0],4),$TY#d + movl ($dat,$XX[0],4),$TX[0]#d + xorb ($inp),$TY#b + inc $inp + movb $TY#b,($out) + inc $out + dec $len + jnz .Lloop1 + jmp .Lexit + +.align 16 +.LRC4_CHAR: + add \$1,$XX[0]#b + movzb ($dat,$XX[0]),$TX[0]#d + test \$-8,$len + jz .Lcloop1 + cmpl \$0,260($dat) + jnz .Lcloop1 + jmp .Lcloop8 +.align 16 +.Lcloop8: + mov ($inp),%eax + mov 4($inp),%ebx +___ +# unroll 2x4-wise, because 64-bit rotates kill Intel P4... +for ($i=0;$i<4;$i++) { +$code.=<<___; + add $TX[0]#b,$YY#b + lea 1($XX[0]),$XX[1] + movzb ($dat,$YY),$TY#d + movzb $XX[1]#b,$XX[1]#d + movzb ($dat,$XX[1]),$TX[1]#d + movb $TX[0]#b,($dat,$YY) + cmp $XX[1],$YY + movb $TY#b,($dat,$XX[0]) + jne .Lcmov$i # Intel cmov is sloooow... + mov $TX[0],$TX[1] +.Lcmov$i: + add $TX[0]#b,$TY#b + xor ($dat,$TY),%al + ror \$8,%eax +___ +push(@TX,shift(@TX)); push(@XX,shift(@XX)); # "rotate" registers +} +for ($i=4;$i<8;$i++) { +$code.=<<___; + add $TX[0]#b,$YY#b + lea 1($XX[0]),$XX[1] + movzb ($dat,$YY),$TY#d + movzb $XX[1]#b,$XX[1]#d + movzb ($dat,$XX[1]),$TX[1]#d + movb $TX[0]#b,($dat,$YY) + cmp $XX[1],$YY + movb $TY#b,($dat,$XX[0]) + jne .Lcmov$i # Intel cmov is sloooow... + mov $TX[0],$TX[1] +.Lcmov$i: + add $TX[0]#b,$TY#b + xor ($dat,$TY),%bl + ror \$8,%ebx +___ +push(@TX,shift(@TX)); push(@XX,shift(@XX)); # "rotate" registers +} +$code.=<<___; + lea -8($len),$len + mov %eax,($out) + lea 8($inp),$inp + mov %ebx,4($out) + lea 8($out),$out + + test \$-8,$len + jnz .Lcloop8 + cmp \$0,$len + jne .Lcloop1 + jmp .Lexit +___ +$code.=<<___; +.align 16 +.Lcloop1: + add $TX[0]#b,$YY#b + movzb ($dat,$YY),$TY#d + movb $TX[0]#b,($dat,$YY) + movb $TY#b,($dat,$XX[0]) + add $TX[0]#b,$TY#b + add \$1,$XX[0]#b + movzb $TY#b,$TY#d + movzb $XX[0]#b,$XX[0]#d + movzb ($dat,$TY),$TY#d + movzb ($dat,$XX[0]),$TX[0]#d + xorb ($inp),$TY#b + lea 1($inp),$inp + movb $TY#b,($out) + lea 1($out),$out + sub \$1,$len + jnz .Lcloop1 + jmp .Lexit + +.align 16 +.Lexit: + sub \$1,$XX[0]#b + movl $XX[0]#d,-8($dat) + movl $YY#d,-4($dat) + + mov (%rsp),%r13 + mov 8(%rsp),%r12 + mov 16(%rsp),%rbx + add \$24,%rsp +.Lepilogue: + ret +.size RC4,.-RC4 +___ + +$idx="%r8"; +$ido="%r9"; + +$code.=<<___; +.extern OPENSSL_ia32cap_P +.globl RC4_set_key +.type RC4_set_key,\@function,3 +.align 16 +RC4_set_key: + lea 8($dat),$dat + lea ($inp,$len),$inp + neg $len + mov $len,%rcx + xor %eax,%eax + xor $ido,$ido + xor %r10,%r10 + xor %r11,%r11 + + mov OPENSSL_ia32cap_P(%rip),$idx#d + bt \$20,$idx#d + jnc .Lw1stloop + bt \$30,$idx#d + setc $ido#b + mov $ido#d,260($dat) + jmp .Lc1stloop + +.align 16 +.Lw1stloop: + mov %eax,($dat,%rax,4) + add \$1,%al + jnc .Lw1stloop + + xor $ido,$ido + xor $idx,$idx +.align 16 +.Lw2ndloop: + mov ($dat,$ido,4),%r10d + add ($inp,$len,1),$idx#b + add %r10b,$idx#b + add \$1,$len + mov ($dat,$idx,4),%r11d + cmovz %rcx,$len + mov %r10d,($dat,$idx,4) + mov %r11d,($dat,$ido,4) + add \$1,$ido#b + jnc .Lw2ndloop + jmp .Lexit_key + +.align 16 +.Lc1stloop: + mov %al,($dat,%rax) + add \$1,%al + jnc .Lc1stloop + + xor $ido,$ido + xor $idx,$idx +.align 16 +.Lc2ndloop: + mov ($dat,$ido),%r10b + add ($inp,$len),$idx#b + add %r10b,$idx#b + add \$1,$len + mov ($dat,$idx),%r11b + jnz .Lcnowrap + mov %rcx,$len +.Lcnowrap: + mov %r10b,($dat,$idx) + mov %r11b,($dat,$ido) + add \$1,$ido#b + jnc .Lc2ndloop + movl \$-1,256($dat) + +.align 16 +.Lexit_key: + xor %eax,%eax + mov %eax,-8($dat) + mov %eax,-4($dat) + ret +.size RC4_set_key,.-RC4_set_key + +.globl RC4_options +.type RC4_options,\@abi-omnipotent +.align 16 +RC4_options: + lea .Lopts(%rip),%rax + mov OPENSSL_ia32cap_P(%rip),%edx + bt \$20,%edx + jnc .Ldone + add \$12,%rax + bt \$30,%edx + jnc .Ldone + add \$13,%rax +.Ldone: + ret +.align 64 +.Lopts: +.asciz "rc4(8x,int)" +.asciz "rc4(8x,char)" +.asciz "rc4(1x,char)" +.asciz "RC4 for x86_64, CRYPTOGAMS by " +.align 64 +.size RC4_options,.-RC4_options +___ + +# EXCEPTION_DISPOSITION handler (EXCEPTION_RECORD *rec,ULONG64 frame, +# CONTEXT *context,DISPATCHER_CONTEXT *disp) +if ($win64) { +$rec="%rcx"; +$frame="%rdx"; +$context="%r8"; +$disp="%r9"; + +$code.=<<___; +.extern __imp_RtlVirtualUnwind +.type stream_se_handler,\@abi-omnipotent +.align 16 +stream_se_handler: + push %rsi + push %rdi + push %rbx + push %rbp + push %r12 + push %r13 + push %r14 + push %r15 + pushfq + sub \$64,%rsp + + mov 120($context),%rax # pull context->Rax + mov 248($context),%rbx # pull context->Rip + + lea .Lprologue(%rip),%r10 + cmp %r10,%rbx # context->RipRsp + + lea .Lepilogue(%rip),%r10 + cmp %r10,%rbx # context->Rip>=epilogue label + jae .Lin_prologue + + lea 24(%rax),%rax + + mov -8(%rax),%rbx + mov -16(%rax),%r12 + mov -24(%rax),%r13 + mov %rbx,144($context) # restore context->Rbx + mov %r12,216($context) # restore context->R12 + mov %r13,224($context) # restore context->R13 + +.Lin_prologue: + mov 8(%rax),%rdi + mov 16(%rax),%rsi + mov %rax,152($context) # restore context->Rsp + mov %rsi,168($context) # restore context->Rsi + mov %rdi,176($context) # restore context->Rdi + + jmp .Lcommon_seh_exit +.size stream_se_handler,.-stream_se_handler + +.type key_se_handler,\@abi-omnipotent +.align 16 +key_se_handler: + push %rsi + push %rdi + push %rbx + push %rbp + push %r12 + push %r13 + push %r14 + push %r15 + pushfq + sub \$64,%rsp + + mov 152($context),%rax # pull context->Rsp + mov 8(%rax),%rdi + mov 16(%rax),%rsi + mov %rsi,168($context) # restore context->Rsi + mov %rdi,176($context) # restore context->Rdi + +.Lcommon_seh_exit: + + mov 40($disp),%rdi # disp->ContextRecord + mov $context,%rsi # context + mov \$154,%ecx # sizeof(CONTEXT) + .long 0xa548f3fc # cld; rep movsq + + mov $disp,%rsi + xor %rcx,%rcx # arg1, UNW_FLAG_NHANDLER + mov 8(%rsi),%rdx # arg2, disp->ImageBase + mov 0(%rsi),%r8 # arg3, disp->ControlPc + mov 16(%rsi),%r9 # arg4, disp->FunctionEntry + mov 40(%rsi),%r10 # disp->ContextRecord + lea 56(%rsi),%r11 # &disp->HandlerData + lea 24(%rsi),%r12 # &disp->EstablisherFrame + mov %r10,32(%rsp) # arg5 + mov %r11,40(%rsp) # arg6 + mov %r12,48(%rsp) # arg7 + mov %rcx,56(%rsp) # arg8, (NULL) + call *__imp_RtlVirtualUnwind(%rip) + + mov \$1,%eax # ExceptionContinueSearch + add \$64,%rsp + popfq + pop %r15 + pop %r14 + pop %r13 + pop %r12 + pop %rbp + pop %rbx + pop %rdi + pop %rsi + ret +.size key_se_handler,.-key_se_handler + +.section .pdata +.align 4 + .rva .LSEH_begin_RC4 + .rva .LSEH_end_RC4 + .rva .LSEH_info_RC4 + + .rva .LSEH_begin_RC4_set_key + .rva .LSEH_end_RC4_set_key + .rva .LSEH_info_RC4_set_key + +.section .xdata +.align 8 +.LSEH_info_RC4: + .byte 9,0,0,0 + .rva stream_se_handler +.LSEH_info_RC4_set_key: + .byte 9,0,0,0 + .rva key_se_handler +___ +} + +$code =~ s/#([bwd])/$1/gm; + +print $code; + +close STDOUT; -- cgit v1.2.3