| Age | Commit message (Collapse) | Author |
|---|
|
Unused import removal
|
|
Only commented out. May want to try showing it until connection success.
|
|
Also show it on click of "Configure" button on system notification popup.
Also allow toggling of status line.
|
|
|
|
|
|
builds VpnProfiles out of them
|
|
I've decided not to include any lib, but to copy the SRPParameters class
to our codebase and Util.trim method to ConfigHelper.
|
|
Some more constants added to ConfigHelper.
This solves #2908.
|
|
This resolves the first step from issue #2908.
Next step: Put user message strings into an appropiate place.
|
|
It's working against cdev.bitmask.net and bitmask.net. Look at #2840 for
further explanation about self signed certificates.
I've also removed some file dependant configuration (when a provider was
custom, ConfigurationWizard still tried to read from file a
provider.json that now I store in memory via ProviderItem class).
|
|
There was a problem on the assets file "bitmask.url". It had an error in
the eip-service url.
We should use this file only for main url, and proceed as if it were a
new provider but with a preseeded main url.
|
|
I've also removed some unnecessary comments from LeapHttpClient.
|
|
We were using it to save certificate and provider.json files from chosen
provider, so that exporting them was easily done.
We don't need that files, because if we wanted to export that files we
would be able to recover them easily and updated.
This fixes #2783
|
|
Variables from LeapSRPSession were there because I used it while testing
srp calculations, comparing that strings with the ones from javascript.
Unused method from ProviderAPI was there because I foresee I'll have to
implement it in the future, but I've removed it since it's already in
the history.
This fixes #2781.
|
|
from provider.json.
This fixes bug #2780
|
|
ConfigHelper refactored methods returning nulls instead of empty objects
broke LeapHttpClient getInstance implementation, because it checked the
emptiness of the object and not if it was null.
|
|
|
|
readability
|
|
|
|
Also implements ConfigHelper.getJsonFromSharedPref(), now
|
|
|
|
|
|
return information
|
|
|
|
boolean, JSONObject)
|
|
The substitution I was doing let me to pass my tests localhost, but was
not valid for real use in Android emulator.
This was so because JSONObject getString method understood \/ simply as
/, while what I wanted was plain \/.
This commit makes #2368
|
|
The problem was the encoding of the bytes when calculating the password
hash. I supposed that it was UTF-8 (I already saw that encoding in the
html code from leap_web), but not, it was ISO-8859-1 (trial/error).
|
|
"https://" is automatically appended.
|
|
LeapSRPSession was doing bad SRP calculations when salt byte array
started with a 0. Now I trimmed that array before using it.
ProviderAPI was not timing out when a server didn't respond. Now, I use
a timeout of 1 second to stop waiting for a response.
|
|
Using two test with values from my localhost leap_web deployment, I've
achieved to login with passwords containing ! and $ without problems.
This should fix bug #2348.
|
|
I download the anon certificate only if allow_anonymous is true, and
before launching Dashboard.
I store it in SharedPreferences, with "cert" key, as a JSON object.
|
|
I've upper cased ConfigHelper constants.
I've created a new method in ConfigHelper, to send requests to a server,
that it's used when sending A and M1.
|
|
Allow registration is present in provider.json.
Provider.json is downloaded from both preseeded and custom providers.
Authentication success or fail is notified correctly to the user.
|
|
It is stored in SharedPrefs, with ConfigHelper.cert_key (="cert") key.
|
|
certificate.
Next step in this branch: detect what the selected provider support in
terms of authenticated/anon users, and show login/logout methods
consecuently.
|
|
The problem was that I needed to append the api_version to the api_uri.
I was doing well in tests because I hardcoded the api urls, but in
production code I was getting from provider.json only api_url and not
api_version.
|
|
request a log in without certificates problems.
I've removed the addition of the certificate when downloaded
eip-service.json, because I already do that in LeapHttpClient.
Solves issue 2367: https://leap.se/code/issues/2367
|
|
Refactored LeapSRPSession so that there is no need to send A twice.
|
|
entered, so that if in the future the client tries to log in or
whatever, it can use the certificate downloaded when added.
Log in dialog works ok, showing a toast when authentication fails (by
this time, I have not managed to get a correct login due to
dev.bitmask.net problems).
dev.bitmask.net works perfectly, via adding it as a new provider
(MeanderingCode, this is for you ;) ).
All GET requests are done by default Android URL class, which means that
certificates trusted by Android are also trusted by us. If there are
problems when logging in due to certificates, the app is able to use
only the certificate associated to the provider in the moment it was
selected as the chosen provider.
|
|
|
|
I need to implement bypass for dev.bitmask.net, because bitmask.net is
down.
|
|
|
|
- SRP algorithm improved (validate method uses trim, and some other
trims have been added).
- Refactored calculatePasswordHash, so that it receives a String instead
of a char array, and now it is capable of escaping "\" correctly.
- A 1000*2 successful logins, with a new test that performs 1000 trials
for 2 different username/password/server trios.
Next step: think about how the user is going to trigger the log in
fragment.
|
|
localhost, but I cannot succeed in api.bitmask.net with my personal account. Next step: add tests from api.bitmask.net.
|
|
|
|
New provider dialog works OK.
|
|
Next step: understand why ca.cert from bitmask is not being downloaded
correctly.
|
|
Conflicts:
src/se/leap/leapclient/ConfigHelper.java
src/se/leap/leapclient/ConfigurationWizard.java
src/se/leap/leapclient/ProviderAPI.java
|
|
strings used to check everything's fine manually.
|
|
(not included here, still to decide if push it publicly).
Next steps: make code beautiful, Android GUI SRP and real
communication server, and add even more tests (in my spare time, just to
check with more users).
|
