diff options
Diffstat (limited to 'app/openssl/crypto/bn/asm/s390x-mont.pl')
| -rw-r--r-- | app/openssl/crypto/bn/asm/s390x-mont.pl | 225 |
1 files changed, 225 insertions, 0 deletions
diff --git a/app/openssl/crypto/bn/asm/s390x-mont.pl b/app/openssl/crypto/bn/asm/s390x-mont.pl new file mode 100644 index 00000000..f61246f5 --- /dev/null +++ b/app/openssl/crypto/bn/asm/s390x-mont.pl @@ -0,0 +1,225 @@ +#!/usr/bin/env perl + +# ==================================================================== +# Written by Andy Polyakov <appro@fy.chalmers.se> for the OpenSSL +# project. The module is, however, dual licensed under OpenSSL and +# CRYPTOGAMS licenses depending on where you obtain it. For further +# details see http://www.openssl.org/~appro/cryptogams/. +# ==================================================================== + +# April 2007. +# +# Performance improvement over vanilla C code varies from 85% to 45% +# depending on key length and benchmark. Unfortunately in this context +# these are not very impressive results [for code that utilizes "wide" +# 64x64=128-bit multiplication, which is not commonly available to C +# programmers], at least hand-coded bn_asm.c replacement is known to +# provide 30-40% better results for longest keys. Well, on a second +# thought it's not very surprising, because z-CPUs are single-issue +# and _strictly_ in-order execution, while bn_mul_mont is more or less +# dependent on CPU ability to pipe-line instructions and have several +# of them "in-flight" at the same time. I mean while other methods, +# for example Karatsuba, aim to minimize amount of multiplications at +# the cost of other operations increase, bn_mul_mont aim to neatly +# "overlap" multiplications and the other operations [and on most +# platforms even minimize the amount of the other operations, in +# particular references to memory]. But it's possible to improve this +# module performance by implementing dedicated squaring code-path and +# possibly by unrolling loops... + +# January 2009. +# +# Reschedule to minimize/avoid Address Generation Interlock hazard, +# make inner loops counter-based. + +$mn0="%r0"; +$num="%r1"; + +# int bn_mul_mont( +$rp="%r2"; # BN_ULONG *rp, +$ap="%r3"; # const BN_ULONG *ap, +$bp="%r4"; # const BN_ULONG *bp, +$np="%r5"; # const BN_ULONG *np, +$n0="%r6"; # const BN_ULONG *n0, +#$num="160(%r15)" # int num); + +$bi="%r2"; # zaps rp +$j="%r7"; + +$ahi="%r8"; +$alo="%r9"; +$nhi="%r10"; +$nlo="%r11"; +$AHI="%r12"; +$NHI="%r13"; +$count="%r14"; +$sp="%r15"; + +$code.=<<___; +.text +.globl bn_mul_mont +.type bn_mul_mont,\@function +bn_mul_mont: + lgf $num,164($sp) # pull $num + sla $num,3 # $num to enumerate bytes + la $bp,0($num,$bp) + + stg %r2,16($sp) + + cghi $num,16 # + lghi %r2,0 # + blr %r14 # if($num<16) return 0; + cghi $num,96 # + bhr %r14 # if($num>96) return 0; + + stmg %r3,%r15,24($sp) + + lghi $rp,-160-8 # leave room for carry bit + lcgr $j,$num # -$num + lgr %r0,$sp + la $rp,0($rp,$sp) + la $sp,0($j,$rp) # alloca + stg %r0,0($sp) # back chain + + sra $num,3 # restore $num + la $bp,0($j,$bp) # restore $bp + ahi $num,-1 # adjust $num for inner loop + lg $n0,0($n0) # pull n0 + + lg $bi,0($bp) + lg $alo,0($ap) + mlgr $ahi,$bi # ap[0]*bp[0] + lgr $AHI,$ahi + + lgr $mn0,$alo # "tp[0]"*n0 + msgr $mn0,$n0 + + lg $nlo,0($np) # + mlgr $nhi,$mn0 # np[0]*m1 + algr $nlo,$alo # +="tp[0]" + lghi $NHI,0 + alcgr $NHI,$nhi + + la $j,8(%r0) # j=1 + lr $count,$num + +.align 16 +.L1st: + lg $alo,0($j,$ap) + mlgr $ahi,$bi # ap[j]*bp[0] + algr $alo,$AHI + lghi $AHI,0 + alcgr $AHI,$ahi + + lg $nlo,0($j,$np) + mlgr $nhi,$mn0 # np[j]*m1 + algr $nlo,$NHI + lghi $NHI,0 + alcgr $nhi,$NHI # +="tp[j]" + algr $nlo,$alo + alcgr $NHI,$nhi + + stg $nlo,160-8($j,$sp) # tp[j-1]= + la $j,8($j) # j++ + brct $count,.L1st + + algr $NHI,$AHI + lghi $AHI,0 + alcgr $AHI,$AHI # upmost overflow bit + stg $NHI,160-8($j,$sp) + stg $AHI,160($j,$sp) + la $bp,8($bp) # bp++ + +.Louter: + lg $bi,0($bp) # bp[i] + lg $alo,0($ap) + mlgr $ahi,$bi # ap[0]*bp[i] + alg $alo,160($sp) # +=tp[0] + lghi $AHI,0 + alcgr $AHI,$ahi + + lgr $mn0,$alo + msgr $mn0,$n0 # tp[0]*n0 + + lg $nlo,0($np) # np[0] + mlgr $nhi,$mn0 # np[0]*m1 + algr $nlo,$alo # +="tp[0]" + lghi $NHI,0 + alcgr $NHI,$nhi + + la $j,8(%r0) # j=1 + lr $count,$num + +.align 16 +.Linner: + lg $alo,0($j,$ap) + mlgr $ahi,$bi # ap[j]*bp[i] + algr $alo,$AHI + lghi $AHI,0 + alcgr $ahi,$AHI + alg $alo,160($j,$sp)# +=tp[j] + alcgr $AHI,$ahi + + lg $nlo,0($j,$np) + mlgr $nhi,$mn0 # np[j]*m1 + algr $nlo,$NHI + lghi $NHI,0 + alcgr $nhi,$NHI + algr $nlo,$alo # +="tp[j]" + alcgr $NHI,$nhi + + stg $nlo,160-8($j,$sp) # tp[j-1]= + la $j,8($j) # j++ + brct $count,.Linner + + algr $NHI,$AHI + lghi $AHI,0 + alcgr $AHI,$AHI + alg $NHI,160($j,$sp)# accumulate previous upmost overflow bit + lghi $ahi,0 + alcgr $AHI,$ahi # new upmost overflow bit + stg $NHI,160-8($j,$sp) + stg $AHI,160($j,$sp) + + la $bp,8($bp) # bp++ + clg $bp,160+8+32($j,$sp) # compare to &bp[num] + jne .Louter + + lg $rp,160+8+16($j,$sp) # reincarnate rp + la $ap,160($sp) + ahi $num,1 # restore $num, incidentally clears "borrow" + + la $j,0(%r0) + lr $count,$num +.Lsub: lg $alo,0($j,$ap) + slbg $alo,0($j,$np) + stg $alo,0($j,$rp) + la $j,8($j) + brct $count,.Lsub + lghi $ahi,0 + slbgr $AHI,$ahi # handle upmost carry + + ngr $ap,$AHI + lghi $np,-1 + xgr $np,$AHI + ngr $np,$rp + ogr $ap,$np # ap=borrow?tp:rp + + la $j,0(%r0) + lgr $count,$num +.Lcopy: lg $alo,0($j,$ap) # copy or in-place refresh + stg $j,160($j,$sp) # zap tp + stg $alo,0($j,$rp) + la $j,8($j) + brct $count,.Lcopy + + la %r1,160+8+48($j,$sp) + lmg %r6,%r15,0(%r1) + lghi %r2,1 # signal "processed" + br %r14 +.size bn_mul_mont,.-bn_mul_mont +.string "Montgomery Multiplication for s390x, CRYPTOGAMS by <appro\@openssl.org>" +___ + +print $code; +close STDOUT; |