diff options
Diffstat (limited to 'app/openssl/crypto/aes/asm/aes-586.pl')
| -rw-r--r--[-rwxr-xr-x] | app/openssl/crypto/aes/asm/aes-586.pl | 20 |
1 files changed, 10 insertions, 10 deletions
diff --git a/app/openssl/crypto/aes/asm/aes-586.pl b/app/openssl/crypto/aes/asm/aes-586.pl index aab40e6f..51b500dd 100755..100644 --- a/app/openssl/crypto/aes/asm/aes-586.pl +++ b/app/openssl/crypto/aes/asm/aes-586.pl @@ -39,13 +39,13 @@ # but exhibits up to 10% improvement on other cores. # # Second version is "monolithic" replacement for aes_core.c, which in -# addition to AES_[de|en]crypt implements AES_set_[de|en]cryption_key. +# addition to AES_[de|en]crypt implements private_AES_set_[de|en]cryption_key. # This made it possible to implement little-endian variant of the # algorithm without modifying the base C code. Motivating factor for # the undertaken effort was that it appeared that in tight IA-32 # register window little-endian flavor could achieve slightly higher # Instruction Level Parallelism, and it indeed resulted in up to 15% -# better performance on most recent µ-archs... +# better performance on most recent µ-archs... # # Third version adds AES_cbc_encrypt implementation, which resulted in # up to 40% performance imrovement of CBC benchmark results. 40% was @@ -223,7 +223,7 @@ sub _data_word() { my $i; while(defined($i=shift)) { &data_word($i,$i); } } $speed_limit=512; # chunks smaller than $speed_limit are # processed with compact routine in CBC mode $small_footprint=1; # $small_footprint=1 code is ~5% slower [on - # recent µ-archs], but ~5 times smaller! + # recent µ-archs], but ~5 times smaller! # I favor compact code to minimize cache # contention and in hope to "collect" 5% back # in real-life applications... @@ -562,7 +562,7 @@ sub enctransform() # Performance is not actually extraordinary in comparison to pure # x86 code. In particular encrypt performance is virtually the same. # Decrypt performance on the other hand is 15-20% better on newer -# µ-archs [but we're thankful for *any* improvement here], and ~50% +# µ-archs [but we're thankful for *any* improvement here], and ~50% # better on PIII:-) And additionally on the pros side this code # eliminates redundant references to stack and thus relieves/ # minimizes the pressure on the memory bus. @@ -2854,12 +2854,12 @@ sub enckey() &set_label("exit"); &function_end("_x86_AES_set_encrypt_key"); -# int AES_set_encrypt_key(const unsigned char *userKey, const int bits, +# int private_AES_set_encrypt_key(const unsigned char *userKey, const int bits, # AES_KEY *key) -&function_begin_B("AES_set_encrypt_key"); +&function_begin_B("private_AES_set_encrypt_key"); &call ("_x86_AES_set_encrypt_key"); &ret (); -&function_end_B("AES_set_encrypt_key"); +&function_end_B("private_AES_set_encrypt_key"); sub deckey() { my ($i,$key,$tp1,$tp2,$tp4,$tp8) = @_; @@ -2916,9 +2916,9 @@ sub deckey() &mov (&DWP(4*$i,$key),$tp1); } -# int AES_set_decrypt_key(const unsigned char *userKey, const int bits, +# int private_AES_set_decrypt_key(const unsigned char *userKey, const int bits, # AES_KEY *key) -&function_begin_B("AES_set_decrypt_key"); +&function_begin_B("private_AES_set_decrypt_key"); &call ("_x86_AES_set_encrypt_key"); &cmp ("eax",0); &je (&label("proceed")); @@ -2974,7 +2974,7 @@ sub deckey() &jb (&label("permute")); &xor ("eax","eax"); # return success -&function_end("AES_set_decrypt_key"); +&function_end("private_AES_set_decrypt_key"); &asciz("AES for x86, CRYPTOGAMS by <appro\@openssl.org>"); &asm_finish(); |