diff options
author | Parménides GV <parmegv@sdf.org> | 2014-04-09 17:07:48 +0200 |
---|---|---|
committer | Parménides GV <parmegv@sdf.org> | 2014-04-09 17:15:17 +0200 |
commit | 51ff5a18f1f074e27e97d822745551a7e8fa068d (patch) | |
tree | 402e7dd42778a218635bb29a4c2dff93ea7f6525 /app/openssl/crypto/sha/asm/sha1-sparcv9a.pl | |
parent | 910b0e1746ab3f63e63808b198ad51fec5b635e5 (diff) | |
parent | b5ba0abc1610dd4bf573ebcabc5e8f6ab0c9528f (diff) |
Merge branch 'feature/implement-gradle-build-system-#4676' into develop
Diffstat (limited to 'app/openssl/crypto/sha/asm/sha1-sparcv9a.pl')
-rw-r--r-- | app/openssl/crypto/sha/asm/sha1-sparcv9a.pl | 601 |
1 files changed, 601 insertions, 0 deletions
diff --git a/app/openssl/crypto/sha/asm/sha1-sparcv9a.pl b/app/openssl/crypto/sha/asm/sha1-sparcv9a.pl new file mode 100644 index 00000000..85e8d680 --- /dev/null +++ b/app/openssl/crypto/sha/asm/sha1-sparcv9a.pl @@ -0,0 +1,601 @@ +#!/usr/bin/env perl + +# ==================================================================== +# Written by Andy Polyakov <appro@fy.chalmers.se> for the OpenSSL +# project. The module is, however, dual licensed under OpenSSL and +# CRYPTOGAMS licenses depending on where you obtain it. For further +# details see http://www.openssl.org/~appro/cryptogams/. +# ==================================================================== + +# January 2009 +# +# Provided that UltraSPARC VIS instructions are pipe-lined(*) and +# pairable(*) with IALU ones, offloading of Xupdate to the UltraSPARC +# Graphic Unit would make it possible to achieve higher instruction- +# level parallelism, ILP, and thus higher performance. It should be +# explicitly noted that ILP is the keyword, and it means that this +# code would be unsuitable for cores like UltraSPARC-Tx. The idea is +# not really novel, Sun had VIS-powered implementation for a while. +# Unlike Sun's implementation this one can process multiple unaligned +# input blocks, and as such works as drop-in replacement for OpenSSL +# sha1_block_data_order. Performance improvement was measured to be +# 40% over pure IALU sha1-sparcv9.pl on UltraSPARC-IIi, but 12% on +# UltraSPARC-III. See below for discussion... +# +# The module does not present direct interest for OpenSSL, because +# it doesn't provide better performance on contemporary SPARCv9 CPUs, +# UltraSPARC-Tx and SPARC64-V[II] to be specific. Those who feel they +# absolutely must score on UltraSPARC-I-IV can simply replace +# crypto/sha/asm/sha1-sparcv9.pl with this module. +# +# (*) "Pipe-lined" means that even if it takes several cycles to +# complete, next instruction using same functional unit [but not +# depending on the result of the current instruction] can start +# execution without having to wait for the unit. "Pairable" +# means that two [or more] independent instructions can be +# issued at the very same time. + +$bits=32; +for (@ARGV) { $bits=64 if (/\-m64/ || /\-xarch\=v9/); } +if ($bits==64) { $bias=2047; $frame=192; } +else { $bias=0; $frame=112; } + +$output=shift; +open STDOUT,">$output"; + +$ctx="%i0"; +$inp="%i1"; +$len="%i2"; +$tmp0="%i3"; +$tmp1="%i4"; +$tmp2="%i5"; +$tmp3="%g5"; + +$base="%g1"; +$align="%g4"; +$Xfer="%o5"; +$nXfer=$tmp3; +$Xi="%o7"; + +$A="%l0"; +$B="%l1"; +$C="%l2"; +$D="%l3"; +$E="%l4"; +@V=($A,$B,$C,$D,$E); + +$Actx="%o0"; +$Bctx="%o1"; +$Cctx="%o2"; +$Dctx="%o3"; +$Ectx="%o4"; + +$fmul="%f32"; +$VK_00_19="%f34"; +$VK_20_39="%f36"; +$VK_40_59="%f38"; +$VK_60_79="%f40"; +@VK=($VK_00_19,$VK_20_39,$VK_40_59,$VK_60_79); +@X=("%f0", "%f1", "%f2", "%f3", "%f4", "%f5", "%f6", "%f7", + "%f8", "%f9","%f10","%f11","%f12","%f13","%f14","%f15","%f16"); + +# This is reference 2x-parallelized VIS-powered Xupdate procedure. It +# covers even K_NN_MM addition... +sub Xupdate { +my ($i)=@_; +my $K=@VK[($i+16)/20]; +my $j=($i+16)%16; + +# [ provided that GSR.alignaddr_offset is 5, $mul contains +# 0x100ULL<<32|0x100 value and K_NN_MM are pre-loaded to +# chosen registers... ] +$code.=<<___; + fxors @X[($j+13)%16],@X[$j],@X[$j] !-1/-1/-1:X[0]^=X[13] + fxors @X[($j+14)%16],@X[$j+1],@X[$j+1]! 0/ 0/ 0:X[1]^=X[14] + fxor @X[($j+2)%16],@X[($j+8)%16],%f18! 1/ 1/ 1:Tmp=X[2,3]^X[8,9] + fxor %f18,@X[$j],@X[$j] ! 2/ 4/ 3:X[0,1]^=X[2,3]^X[8,9] + faligndata @X[$j],@X[$j],%f18 ! 3/ 7/ 5:Tmp=X[0,1]>>>24 + fpadd32 @X[$j],@X[$j],@X[$j] ! 4/ 8/ 6:X[0,1]<<=1 + fmul8ulx16 %f18,$fmul,%f18 ! 5/10/ 7:Tmp>>=7, Tmp&=1 + ![fxors %f15,%f2,%f2] + for %f18,@X[$j],@X[$j] ! 8/14/10:X[0,1]|=Tmp + ![fxors %f0,%f3,%f3] !10/17/12:X[0] dependency + fpadd32 $K,@X[$j],%f20 + std %f20,[$Xfer+`4*$j`] +___ +# The numbers delimited with slash are the earliest possible dispatch +# cycles for given instruction assuming 1 cycle latency for simple VIS +# instructions, such as on UltraSPARC-I&II, 3 cycles latency, such as +# on UltraSPARC-III&IV, and 2 cycles latency(*), respectively. Being +# 2x-parallelized the procedure is "worth" 5, 8.5 or 6 ticks per SHA1 +# round. As [long as] FPU/VIS instructions are perfectly pairable with +# IALU ones, the round timing is defined by the maximum between VIS +# and IALU timings. The latter varies from round to round and averages +# out at 6.25 ticks. This means that USI&II should operate at IALU +# rate, while USIII&IV - at VIS rate. This explains why performance +# improvement varies among processors. Well, given that pure IALU +# sha1-sparcv9.pl module exhibits virtually uniform performance of +# ~9.3 cycles per SHA1 round. Timings mentioned above are theoretical +# lower limits. Real-life performance was measured to be 6.6 cycles +# per SHA1 round on USIIi and 8.3 on USIII. The latter is lower than +# half-round VIS timing, because there are 16 Xupdate-free rounds, +# which "push down" average theoretical timing to 8 cycles... + +# (*) SPARC64-V[II] was originally believed to have 2 cycles VIS +# latency. Well, it might have, but it doesn't have dedicated +# VIS-unit. Instead, VIS instructions are executed by other +# functional units, ones used here - by IALU. This doesn't +# improve effective ILP... +} + +# The reference Xupdate procedure is then "strained" over *pairs* of +# BODY_NN_MM and kind of modulo-scheduled in respect to X[n]^=X[n+13] +# and K_NN_MM addition. It's "running" 15 rounds ahead, which leaves +# plenty of room to amortize for read-after-write hazard, as well as +# to fetch and align input for the next spin. The VIS instructions are +# scheduled for latency of 2 cycles, because there are not enough IALU +# instructions to schedule for latency of 3, while scheduling for 1 +# would give no gain on USI&II anyway. + +sub BODY_00_19 { +my ($i,$a,$b,$c,$d,$e)=@_; +my $j=$i&~1; +my $k=($j+16+2)%16; # ahead reference +my $l=($j+16-2)%16; # behind reference +my $K=@VK[($j+16-2)/20]; + +$j=($j+16)%16; + +$code.=<<___ if (!($i&1)); + sll $a,5,$tmp0 !! $i + and $c,$b,$tmp3 + ld [$Xfer+`4*($i%16)`],$Xi + fxors @X[($j+14)%16],@X[$j+1],@X[$j+1]! 0/ 0/ 0:X[1]^=X[14] + srl $a,27,$tmp1 + add $tmp0,$e,$e + fxor @X[($j+2)%16],@X[($j+8)%16],%f18! 1/ 1/ 1:Tmp=X[2,3]^X[8,9] + sll $b,30,$tmp2 + add $tmp1,$e,$e + andn $d,$b,$tmp1 + add $Xi,$e,$e + fxor %f18,@X[$j],@X[$j] ! 2/ 4/ 3:X[0,1]^=X[2,3]^X[8,9] + srl $b,2,$b + or $tmp1,$tmp3,$tmp1 + or $tmp2,$b,$b + add $tmp1,$e,$e + faligndata @X[$j],@X[$j],%f18 ! 3/ 7/ 5:Tmp=X[0,1]>>>24 +___ +$code.=<<___ if ($i&1); + sll $a,5,$tmp0 !! $i + and $c,$b,$tmp3 + ld [$Xfer+`4*($i%16)`],$Xi + fpadd32 @X[$j],@X[$j],@X[$j] ! 4/ 8/ 6:X[0,1]<<=1 + srl $a,27,$tmp1 + add $tmp0,$e,$e + fmul8ulx16 %f18,$fmul,%f18 ! 5/10/ 7:Tmp>>=7, Tmp&=1 + sll $b,30,$tmp2 + add $tmp1,$e,$e + fpadd32 $K,@X[$l],%f20 ! + andn $d,$b,$tmp1 + add $Xi,$e,$e + fxors @X[($k+13)%16],@X[$k],@X[$k] !-1/-1/-1:X[0]^=X[13] + srl $b,2,$b + or $tmp1,$tmp3,$tmp1 + fxor %f18,@X[$j],@X[$j] ! 8/14/10:X[0,1]|=Tmp + or $tmp2,$b,$b + add $tmp1,$e,$e +___ +$code.=<<___ if ($i&1 && $i>=2); + std %f20,[$Xfer+`4*$l`] ! +___ +} + +sub BODY_20_39 { +my ($i,$a,$b,$c,$d,$e)=@_; +my $j=$i&~1; +my $k=($j+16+2)%16; # ahead reference +my $l=($j+16-2)%16; # behind reference +my $K=@VK[($j+16-2)/20]; + +$j=($j+16)%16; + +$code.=<<___ if (!($i&1) && $i<64); + sll $a,5,$tmp0 !! $i + ld [$Xfer+`4*($i%16)`],$Xi + fxors @X[($j+14)%16],@X[$j+1],@X[$j+1]! 0/ 0/ 0:X[1]^=X[14] + srl $a,27,$tmp1 + add $tmp0,$e,$e + fxor @X[($j+2)%16],@X[($j+8)%16],%f18! 1/ 1/ 1:Tmp=X[2,3]^X[8,9] + xor $c,$b,$tmp0 + add $tmp1,$e,$e + sll $b,30,$tmp2 + xor $d,$tmp0,$tmp1 + fxor %f18,@X[$j],@X[$j] ! 2/ 4/ 3:X[0,1]^=X[2,3]^X[8,9] + srl $b,2,$b + add $tmp1,$e,$e + or $tmp2,$b,$b + add $Xi,$e,$e + faligndata @X[$j],@X[$j],%f18 ! 3/ 7/ 5:Tmp=X[0,1]>>>24 +___ +$code.=<<___ if ($i&1 && $i<64); + sll $a,5,$tmp0 !! $i + ld [$Xfer+`4*($i%16)`],$Xi + fpadd32 @X[$j],@X[$j],@X[$j] ! 4/ 8/ 6:X[0,1]<<=1 + srl $a,27,$tmp1 + add $tmp0,$e,$e + fmul8ulx16 %f18,$fmul,%f18 ! 5/10/ 7:Tmp>>=7, Tmp&=1 + xor $c,$b,$tmp0 + add $tmp1,$e,$e + fpadd32 $K,@X[$l],%f20 ! + sll $b,30,$tmp2 + xor $d,$tmp0,$tmp1 + fxors @X[($k+13)%16],@X[$k],@X[$k] !-1/-1/-1:X[0]^=X[13] + srl $b,2,$b + add $tmp1,$e,$e + fxor %f18,@X[$j],@X[$j] ! 8/14/10:X[0,1]|=Tmp + or $tmp2,$b,$b + add $Xi,$e,$e + std %f20,[$Xfer+`4*$l`] ! +___ +$code.=<<___ if ($i==64); + sll $a,5,$tmp0 !! $i + ld [$Xfer+`4*($i%16)`],$Xi + fpadd32 $K,@X[$l],%f20 + srl $a,27,$tmp1 + add $tmp0,$e,$e + xor $c,$b,$tmp0 + add $tmp1,$e,$e + sll $b,30,$tmp2 + xor $d,$tmp0,$tmp1 + std %f20,[$Xfer+`4*$l`] + srl $b,2,$b + add $tmp1,$e,$e + or $tmp2,$b,$b + add $Xi,$e,$e +___ +$code.=<<___ if ($i>64); + sll $a,5,$tmp0 !! $i + ld [$Xfer+`4*($i%16)`],$Xi + srl $a,27,$tmp1 + add $tmp0,$e,$e + xor $c,$b,$tmp0 + add $tmp1,$e,$e + sll $b,30,$tmp2 + xor $d,$tmp0,$tmp1 + srl $b,2,$b + add $tmp1,$e,$e + or $tmp2,$b,$b + add $Xi,$e,$e +___ +} + +sub BODY_40_59 { +my ($i,$a,$b,$c,$d,$e)=@_; +my $j=$i&~1; +my $k=($j+16+2)%16; # ahead reference +my $l=($j+16-2)%16; # behind reference +my $K=@VK[($j+16-2)/20]; + +$j=($j+16)%16; + +$code.=<<___ if (!($i&1)); + sll $a,5,$tmp0 !! $i + ld [$Xfer+`4*($i%16)`],$Xi + fxors @X[($j+14)%16],@X[$j+1],@X[$j+1]! 0/ 0/ 0:X[1]^=X[14] + srl $a,27,$tmp1 + add $tmp0,$e,$e + fxor @X[($j+2)%16],@X[($j+8)%16],%f18! 1/ 1/ 1:Tmp=X[2,3]^X[8,9] + and $c,$b,$tmp0 + add $tmp1,$e,$e + sll $b,30,$tmp2 + or $c,$b,$tmp1 + fxor %f18,@X[$j],@X[$j] ! 2/ 4/ 3:X[0,1]^=X[2,3]^X[8,9] + srl $b,2,$b + and $d,$tmp1,$tmp1 + add $Xi,$e,$e + or $tmp1,$tmp0,$tmp1 + faligndata @X[$j],@X[$j],%f18 ! 3/ 7/ 5:Tmp=X[0,1]>>>24 + or $tmp2,$b,$b + add $tmp1,$e,$e + fpadd32 @X[$j],@X[$j],@X[$j] ! 4/ 8/ 6:X[0,1]<<=1 +___ +$code.=<<___ if ($i&1); + sll $a,5,$tmp0 !! $i + ld [$Xfer+`4*($i%16)`],$Xi + srl $a,27,$tmp1 + add $tmp0,$e,$e + fmul8ulx16 %f18,$fmul,%f18 ! 5/10/ 7:Tmp>>=7, Tmp&=1 + and $c,$b,$tmp0 + add $tmp1,$e,$e + fpadd32 $K,@X[$l],%f20 ! + sll $b,30,$tmp2 + or $c,$b,$tmp1 + fxors @X[($k+13)%16],@X[$k],@X[$k] !-1/-1/-1:X[0]^=X[13] + srl $b,2,$b + and $d,$tmp1,$tmp1 + fxor %f18,@X[$j],@X[$j] ! 8/14/10:X[0,1]|=Tmp + add $Xi,$e,$e + or $tmp1,$tmp0,$tmp1 + or $tmp2,$b,$b + add $tmp1,$e,$e + std %f20,[$Xfer+`4*$l`] ! +___ +} + +# If there is more data to process, then we pre-fetch the data for +# next iteration in last ten rounds... +sub BODY_70_79 { +my ($i,$a,$b,$c,$d,$e)=@_; +my $j=$i&~1; +my $m=($i%8)*2; + +$j=($j+16)%16; + +$code.=<<___ if ($i==70); + sll $a,5,$tmp0 !! $i + ld [$Xfer+`4*($i%16)`],$Xi + srl $a,27,$tmp1 + add $tmp0,$e,$e + ldd [$inp+64],@X[0] + xor $c,$b,$tmp0 + add $tmp1,$e,$e + sll $b,30,$tmp2 + xor $d,$tmp0,$tmp1 + srl $b,2,$b + add $tmp1,$e,$e + or $tmp2,$b,$b + add $Xi,$e,$e + + and $inp,-64,$nXfer + inc 64,$inp + and $nXfer,255,$nXfer + alignaddr %g0,$align,%g0 + add $base,$nXfer,$nXfer +___ +$code.=<<___ if ($i==71); + sll $a,5,$tmp0 !! $i + ld [$Xfer+`4*($i%16)`],$Xi + srl $a,27,$tmp1 + add $tmp0,$e,$e + xor $c,$b,$tmp0 + add $tmp1,$e,$e + sll $b,30,$tmp2 + xor $d,$tmp0,$tmp1 + srl $b,2,$b + add $tmp1,$e,$e + or $tmp2,$b,$b + add $Xi,$e,$e +___ +$code.=<<___ if ($i>=72); + faligndata @X[$m],@X[$m+2],@X[$m] + sll $a,5,$tmp0 !! $i + ld [$Xfer+`4*($i%16)`],$Xi + srl $a,27,$tmp1 + add $tmp0,$e,$e + xor $c,$b,$tmp0 + add $tmp1,$e,$e + fpadd32 $VK_00_19,@X[$m],%f20 + sll $b,30,$tmp2 + xor $d,$tmp0,$tmp1 + srl $b,2,$b + add $tmp1,$e,$e + or $tmp2,$b,$b + add $Xi,$e,$e +___ +$code.=<<___ if ($i<77); + ldd [$inp+`8*($i+1-70)`],@X[2*($i+1-70)] +___ +$code.=<<___ if ($i==77); # redundant if $inp was aligned + add $align,63,$tmp0 + and $tmp0,-8,$tmp0 + ldd [$inp+$tmp0],@X[16] +___ +$code.=<<___ if ($i>=72); + std %f20,[$nXfer+`4*$m`] +___ +} + +$code.=<<___; +.section ".text",#alloc,#execinstr + +.align 64 +vis_const: +.long 0x5a827999,0x5a827999 ! K_00_19 +.long 0x6ed9eba1,0x6ed9eba1 ! K_20_39 +.long 0x8f1bbcdc,0x8f1bbcdc ! K_40_59 +.long 0xca62c1d6,0xca62c1d6 ! K_60_79 +.long 0x00000100,0x00000100 +.align 64 +.type vis_const,#object +.size vis_const,(.-vis_const) + +.globl sha1_block_data_order +sha1_block_data_order: + save %sp,-$frame,%sp + add %fp,$bias-256,$base + +1: call .+8 + add %o7,vis_const-1b,$tmp0 + + ldd [$tmp0+0],$VK_00_19 + ldd [$tmp0+8],$VK_20_39 + ldd [$tmp0+16],$VK_40_59 + ldd [$tmp0+24],$VK_60_79 + ldd [$tmp0+32],$fmul + + ld [$ctx+0],$Actx + and $base,-256,$base + ld [$ctx+4],$Bctx + sub $base,$bias+$frame,%sp + ld [$ctx+8],$Cctx + and $inp,7,$align + ld [$ctx+12],$Dctx + and $inp,-8,$inp + ld [$ctx+16],$Ectx + + ! X[16] is maintained in FP register bank + alignaddr %g0,$align,%g0 + ldd [$inp+0],@X[0] + sub $inp,-64,$Xfer + ldd [$inp+8],@X[2] + and $Xfer,-64,$Xfer + ldd [$inp+16],@X[4] + and $Xfer,255,$Xfer + ldd [$inp+24],@X[6] + add $base,$Xfer,$Xfer + ldd [$inp+32],@X[8] + ldd [$inp+40],@X[10] + ldd [$inp+48],@X[12] + brz,pt $align,.Laligned + ldd [$inp+56],@X[14] + + ldd [$inp+64],@X[16] + faligndata @X[0],@X[2],@X[0] + faligndata @X[2],@X[4],@X[2] + faligndata @X[4],@X[6],@X[4] + faligndata @X[6],@X[8],@X[6] + faligndata @X[8],@X[10],@X[8] + faligndata @X[10],@X[12],@X[10] + faligndata @X[12],@X[14],@X[12] + faligndata @X[14],@X[16],@X[14] + +.Laligned: + mov 5,$tmp0 + dec 1,$len + alignaddr %g0,$tmp0,%g0 + fpadd32 $VK_00_19,@X[0],%f16 + fpadd32 $VK_00_19,@X[2],%f18 + fpadd32 $VK_00_19,@X[4],%f20 + fpadd32 $VK_00_19,@X[6],%f22 + fpadd32 $VK_00_19,@X[8],%f24 + fpadd32 $VK_00_19,@X[10],%f26 + fpadd32 $VK_00_19,@X[12],%f28 + fpadd32 $VK_00_19,@X[14],%f30 + std %f16,[$Xfer+0] + mov $Actx,$A + std %f18,[$Xfer+8] + mov $Bctx,$B + std %f20,[$Xfer+16] + mov $Cctx,$C + std %f22,[$Xfer+24] + mov $Dctx,$D + std %f24,[$Xfer+32] + mov $Ectx,$E + std %f26,[$Xfer+40] + fxors @X[13],@X[0],@X[0] + std %f28,[$Xfer+48] + ba .Loop + std %f30,[$Xfer+56] +.align 32 +.Loop: +___ +for ($i=0;$i<20;$i++) { &BODY_00_19($i,@V); unshift(@V,pop(@V)); } +for (;$i<40;$i++) { &BODY_20_39($i,@V); unshift(@V,pop(@V)); } +for (;$i<60;$i++) { &BODY_40_59($i,@V); unshift(@V,pop(@V)); } +for (;$i<70;$i++) { &BODY_20_39($i,@V); unshift(@V,pop(@V)); } +$code.=<<___; + tst $len + bz,pn `$bits==32?"%icc":"%xcc"`,.Ltail + nop +___ +for (;$i<80;$i++) { &BODY_70_79($i,@V); unshift(@V,pop(@V)); } +$code.=<<___; + add $A,$Actx,$Actx + add $B,$Bctx,$Bctx + add $C,$Cctx,$Cctx + add $D,$Dctx,$Dctx + add $E,$Ectx,$Ectx + mov 5,$tmp0 + fxors @X[13],@X[0],@X[0] + mov $Actx,$A + mov $Bctx,$B + mov $Cctx,$C + mov $Dctx,$D + mov $Ectx,$E + alignaddr %g0,$tmp0,%g0 + dec 1,$len + ba .Loop + mov $nXfer,$Xfer + +.align 32 +.Ltail: +___ +for($i=70;$i<80;$i++) { &BODY_20_39($i,@V); unshift(@V,pop(@V)); } +$code.=<<___; + add $A,$Actx,$Actx + add $B,$Bctx,$Bctx + add $C,$Cctx,$Cctx + add $D,$Dctx,$Dctx + add $E,$Ectx,$Ectx + + st $Actx,[$ctx+0] + st $Bctx,[$ctx+4] + st $Cctx,[$ctx+8] + st $Dctx,[$ctx+12] + st $Ectx,[$ctx+16] + + ret + restore +.type sha1_block_data_order,#function +.size sha1_block_data_order,(.-sha1_block_data_order) +.asciz "SHA1 block transform for SPARCv9a, CRYPTOGAMS by <appro\@openssl.org>" +.align 4 +___ + +# Purpose of these subroutines is to explicitly encode VIS instructions, +# so that one can compile the module without having to specify VIS +# extentions on compiler command line, e.g. -xarch=v9 vs. -xarch=v9a. +# Idea is to reserve for option to produce "universal" binary and let +# programmer detect if current CPU is VIS capable at run-time. +sub unvis { +my ($mnemonic,$rs1,$rs2,$rd)=@_; +my $ref,$opf; +my %visopf = ( "fmul8ulx16" => 0x037, + "faligndata" => 0x048, + "fpadd32" => 0x052, + "fxor" => 0x06c, + "fxors" => 0x06d ); + + $ref = "$mnemonic\t$rs1,$rs2,$rd"; + + if ($opf=$visopf{$mnemonic}) { + foreach ($rs1,$rs2,$rd) { + return $ref if (!/%f([0-9]{1,2})/); + $_=$1; + if ($1>=32) { + return $ref if ($1&1); + # re-encode for upper double register addressing + $_=($1|$1>>5)&31; + } + } + + return sprintf ".word\t0x%08x !%s", + 0x81b00000|$rd<<25|$rs1<<14|$opf<<5|$rs2, + $ref; + } else { + return $ref; + } +} +sub unalignaddr { +my ($mnemonic,$rs1,$rs2,$rd)=@_; +my %bias = ( "g" => 0, "o" => 8, "l" => 16, "i" => 24 ); +my $ref="$mnemonic\t$rs1,$rs2,$rd"; + + foreach ($rs1,$rs2,$rd) { + if (/%([goli])([0-7])/) { $_=$bias{$1}+$2; } + else { return $ref; } + } + return sprintf ".word\t0x%08x !%s", + 0x81b00300|$rd<<25|$rs1<<14|$rs2, + $ref; +} + +$code =~ s/\`([^\`]*)\`/eval $1/gem; +$code =~ s/\b(f[^\s]*)\s+(%f[0-9]{1,2}),(%f[0-9]{1,2}),(%f[0-9]{1,2})/ + &unvis($1,$2,$3,$4) + /gem; +$code =~ s/\b(alignaddr)\s+(%[goli][0-7]),(%[goli][0-7]),(%[goli][0-7])/ + &unalignaddr($1,$2,$3,$4) + /gem; +print $code; +close STDOUT; |