Back to the standard "app" module.

This return to "app" instead of "bitmask_android" is due to this reading: https://developer.android.com/sdk/installing/studio-build.html#projectStructure
I'll have to tweak the final apk name in build.gradle.

1 files changed, 601 insertions, 0 deletions

diff --git a/app/openssl/crypto/sha/asm/sha1-sparcv9a.pl b/app/openssl/crypto/sha/asm/sha1-sparcv9a.pl
new file mode 100644
index 00000000..85e8d680
--- /dev/null
+++ b/app/openssl/crypto/sha/asm/sha1-sparcv9a.pl
@@ -0,0 +1,601 @@
+#!/usr/bin/env perl
+
+# ====================================================================
+# Written by Andy Polyakov <appro@fy.chalmers.se> for the OpenSSL
+# project. The module is, however, dual licensed under OpenSSL and
+# CRYPTOGAMS licenses depending on where you obtain it. For further
+# details see http://www.openssl.org/~appro/cryptogams/.
+# ====================================================================
+
+# January 2009
+#
+# Provided that UltraSPARC VIS instructions are pipe-lined(*) and
+# pairable(*) with IALU ones, offloading of Xupdate to the UltraSPARC
+# Graphic Unit would make it possible to achieve higher instruction-
+# level parallelism, ILP, and thus higher performance. It should be
+# explicitly noted that ILP is the keyword, and it means that this
+# code would be unsuitable for cores like UltraSPARC-Tx. The idea is
+# not really novel, Sun had VIS-powered implementation for a while.
+# Unlike Sun's implementation this one can process multiple unaligned
+# input blocks, and as such works as drop-in replacement for OpenSSL
+# sha1_block_data_order. Performance improvement was measured to be
+# 40% over pure IALU sha1-sparcv9.pl on UltraSPARC-IIi, but 12% on
+# UltraSPARC-III. See below for discussion...
+#
+# The module does not present direct interest for OpenSSL, because
+# it doesn't provide better performance on contemporary SPARCv9 CPUs,
+# UltraSPARC-Tx and SPARC64-V[II] to be specific. Those who feel they
+# absolutely must score on UltraSPARC-I-IV can simply replace
+# crypto/sha/asm/sha1-sparcv9.pl with this module.
+#
+# (*)	"Pipe-lined" means that even if it takes several cycles to
+#	complete, next instruction using same functional unit [but not
+#	depending on the result of the current instruction] can start
+#	execution without having to wait for the unit. "Pairable"
+#	means that two [or more] independent instructions can be
+#	issued at the very same time.
+
+$bits=32;
+for (@ARGV)	{ $bits=64 if (/\-m64/ || /\-xarch\=v9/); }
+if ($bits==64)	{ $bias=2047; $frame=192; }
+else		{ $bias=0;    $frame=112; }
+
+$output=shift;
+open STDOUT,">$output";
+
+$ctx="%i0";
+$inp="%i1";
+$len="%i2";
+$tmp0="%i3";
+$tmp1="%i4";
+$tmp2="%i5";
+$tmp3="%g5";
+
+$base="%g1";
+$align="%g4";
+$Xfer="%o5";
+$nXfer=$tmp3;
+$Xi="%o7";
+
+$A="%l0";
+$B="%l1";
+$C="%l2";
+$D="%l3";
+$E="%l4";
+@V=($A,$B,$C,$D,$E);
+
+$Actx="%o0";
+$Bctx="%o1";
+$Cctx="%o2";
+$Dctx="%o3";
+$Ectx="%o4";
+
+$fmul="%f32";
+$VK_00_19="%f34";
+$VK_20_39="%f36";
+$VK_40_59="%f38";
+$VK_60_79="%f40";
+@VK=($VK_00_19,$VK_20_39,$VK_40_59,$VK_60_79);
+@X=("%f0", "%f1", "%f2", "%f3", "%f4", "%f5", "%f6", "%f7",
+    "%f8", "%f9","%f10","%f11","%f12","%f13","%f14","%f15","%f16");
+
+# This is reference 2x-parallelized VIS-powered Xupdate procedure. It
+# covers even K_NN_MM addition...
+sub Xupdate {
+my ($i)=@_;
+my $K=@VK[($i+16)/20];
+my $j=($i+16)%16;
+
+#	[ provided that GSR.alignaddr_offset is 5, $mul contains
+#	  0x100ULL<<32|0x100 value and K_NN_MM are pre-loaded to
+#	  chosen registers... ]
+$code.=<<___;
+	fxors		@X[($j+13)%16],@X[$j],@X[$j]	!-1/-1/-1:X[0]^=X[13]
+	fxors		@X[($j+14)%16],@X[$j+1],@X[$j+1]! 0/ 0/ 0:X[1]^=X[14]
+	fxor		@X[($j+2)%16],@X[($j+8)%16],%f18! 1/ 1/ 1:Tmp=X[2,3]^X[8,9]
+	fxor		%f18,@X[$j],@X[$j]		! 2/ 4/ 3:X[0,1]^=X[2,3]^X[8,9]
+	faligndata	@X[$j],@X[$j],%f18		! 3/ 7/ 5:Tmp=X[0,1]>>>24
+	fpadd32		@X[$j],@X[$j],@X[$j]		! 4/ 8/ 6:X[0,1]<<=1
+	fmul8ulx16	%f18,$fmul,%f18			! 5/10/ 7:Tmp>>=7, Tmp&=1
+	![fxors		%f15,%f2,%f2]
+	for		%f18,@X[$j],@X[$j]		! 8/14/10:X[0,1]|=Tmp
+	![fxors		%f0,%f3,%f3]			!10/17/12:X[0] dependency
+	fpadd32		$K,@X[$j],%f20
+	std		%f20,[$Xfer+`4*$j`]
+___
+# The numbers delimited with slash are the earliest possible dispatch
+# cycles for given instruction assuming 1 cycle latency for simple VIS
+# instructions, such as on UltraSPARC-I&II, 3 cycles latency, such as
+# on UltraSPARC-III&IV, and 2 cycles latency(*), respectively. Being
+# 2x-parallelized the procedure is "worth" 5, 8.5 or 6 ticks per SHA1
+# round. As [long as] FPU/VIS instructions are perfectly pairable with
+# IALU ones, the round timing is defined by the maximum between VIS
+# and IALU timings. The latter varies from round to round and averages
+# out at 6.25 ticks. This means that USI&II should operate at IALU
+# rate, while USIII&IV - at VIS rate. This explains why performance
+# improvement varies among processors. Well, given that pure IALU
+# sha1-sparcv9.pl module exhibits virtually uniform performance of
+# ~9.3 cycles per SHA1 round. Timings mentioned above are theoretical
+# lower limits. Real-life performance was measured to be 6.6 cycles
+# per SHA1 round on USIIi and 8.3 on USIII. The latter is lower than
+# half-round VIS timing, because there are 16 Xupdate-free rounds,
+# which "push down" average theoretical timing to 8 cycles...
+
+# (*)	SPARC64-V[II] was originally believed to have 2 cycles VIS
+#	latency. Well, it might have, but it doesn't have dedicated
+#	VIS-unit. Instead, VIS instructions are executed by other
+#	functional units, ones used here - by IALU. This doesn't
+#	improve effective ILP...
+}
+
+# The reference Xupdate procedure is then "strained" over *pairs* of
+# BODY_NN_MM and kind of modulo-scheduled in respect to X[n]^=X[n+13]
+# and K_NN_MM addition. It's "running" 15 rounds ahead, which leaves
+# plenty of room to amortize for read-after-write hazard, as well as
+# to fetch and align input for the next spin. The VIS instructions are
+# scheduled for latency of 2 cycles, because there are not enough IALU
+# instructions to schedule for latency of 3, while scheduling for 1
+# would give no gain on USI&II anyway.
+
+sub BODY_00_19 {
+my ($i,$a,$b,$c,$d,$e)=@_;
+my $j=$i&~1;
+my $k=($j+16+2)%16;	# ahead reference
+my $l=($j+16-2)%16;	# behind reference
+my $K=@VK[($j+16-2)/20];
+
+$j=($j+16)%16;
+
+$code.=<<___ if (!($i&1));
+	sll		$a,5,$tmp0			!! $i
+	and		$c,$b,$tmp3
+	ld		[$Xfer+`4*($i%16)`],$Xi
+	 fxors		@X[($j+14)%16],@X[$j+1],@X[$j+1]! 0/ 0/ 0:X[1]^=X[14]
+	srl		$a,27,$tmp1
+	add		$tmp0,$e,$e
+	 fxor		@X[($j+2)%16],@X[($j+8)%16],%f18! 1/ 1/ 1:Tmp=X[2,3]^X[8,9]
+	sll		$b,30,$tmp2
+	add		$tmp1,$e,$e
+	andn		$d,$b,$tmp1
+	add		$Xi,$e,$e
+	 fxor		%f18,@X[$j],@X[$j]		! 2/ 4/ 3:X[0,1]^=X[2,3]^X[8,9]
+	srl		$b,2,$b
+	or		$tmp1,$tmp3,$tmp1
+	or		$tmp2,$b,$b
+	add		$tmp1,$e,$e
+	 faligndata	@X[$j],@X[$j],%f18		! 3/ 7/ 5:Tmp=X[0,1]>>>24
+___
+$code.=<<___ if ($i&1);
+	sll		$a,5,$tmp0			!! $i
+	and		$c,$b,$tmp3
+	ld		[$Xfer+`4*($i%16)`],$Xi
+	 fpadd32	@X[$j],@X[$j],@X[$j]		! 4/ 8/ 6:X[0,1]<<=1
+	srl		$a,27,$tmp1
+	add		$tmp0,$e,$e
+	 fmul8ulx16	%f18,$fmul,%f18			! 5/10/ 7:Tmp>>=7, Tmp&=1
+	sll		$b,30,$tmp2
+	add		$tmp1,$e,$e
+	 fpadd32	$K,@X[$l],%f20			!
+	andn		$d,$b,$tmp1
+	add		$Xi,$e,$e
+	 fxors		@X[($k+13)%16],@X[$k],@X[$k]	!-1/-1/-1:X[0]^=X[13]
+	srl		$b,2,$b
+	or		$tmp1,$tmp3,$tmp1
+	 fxor		%f18,@X[$j],@X[$j]		! 8/14/10:X[0,1]|=Tmp
+	or		$tmp2,$b,$b
+	add		$tmp1,$e,$e
+___
+$code.=<<___ if ($i&1 && $i>=2);
+	 std		%f20,[$Xfer+`4*$l`]		!
+___
+}
+
+sub BODY_20_39 {
+my ($i,$a,$b,$c,$d,$e)=@_;
+my $j=$i&~1;
+my $k=($j+16+2)%16;	# ahead reference
+my $l=($j+16-2)%16;	# behind reference
+my $K=@VK[($j+16-2)/20];
+
+$j=($j+16)%16;
+
+$code.=<<___ if (!($i&1) && $i<64);
+	sll		$a,5,$tmp0			!! $i
+	ld		[$Xfer+`4*($i%16)`],$Xi
+	 fxors		@X[($j+14)%16],@X[$j+1],@X[$j+1]! 0/ 0/ 0:X[1]^=X[14]
+	srl		$a,27,$tmp1
+	add		$tmp0,$e,$e
+	 fxor		@X[($j+2)%16],@X[($j+8)%16],%f18! 1/ 1/ 1:Tmp=X[2,3]^X[8,9]
+	xor		$c,$b,$tmp0
+	add		$tmp1,$e,$e
+	sll		$b,30,$tmp2
+	xor		$d,$tmp0,$tmp1
+	 fxor		%f18,@X[$j],@X[$j]		! 2/ 4/ 3:X[0,1]^=X[2,3]^X[8,9]
+	srl		$b,2,$b
+	add		$tmp1,$e,$e
+	or		$tmp2,$b,$b
+	add		$Xi,$e,$e
+	 faligndata	@X[$j],@X[$j],%f18		! 3/ 7/ 5:Tmp=X[0,1]>>>24
+___
+$code.=<<___ if ($i&1 && $i<64);
+	sll		$a,5,$tmp0			!! $i
+	ld		[$Xfer+`4*($i%16)`],$Xi
+	 fpadd32	@X[$j],@X[$j],@X[$j]		! 4/ 8/ 6:X[0,1]<<=1
+	srl		$a,27,$tmp1
+	add		$tmp0,$e,$e
+	 fmul8ulx16	%f18,$fmul,%f18			! 5/10/ 7:Tmp>>=7, Tmp&=1
+	xor		$c,$b,$tmp0
+	add		$tmp1,$e,$e
+	 fpadd32	$K,@X[$l],%f20			!
+	sll		$b,30,$tmp2
+	xor		$d,$tmp0,$tmp1
+	 fxors		@X[($k+13)%16],@X[$k],@X[$k]	!-1/-1/-1:X[0]^=X[13]
+	srl		$b,2,$b
+	add		$tmp1,$e,$e
+	 fxor		%f18,@X[$j],@X[$j]		! 8/14/10:X[0,1]|=Tmp
+	or		$tmp2,$b,$b
+	add		$Xi,$e,$e
+	 std		%f20,[$Xfer+`4*$l`]		!
+___
+$code.=<<___ if ($i==64);
+	sll		$a,5,$tmp0			!! $i
+	ld		[$Xfer+`4*($i%16)`],$Xi
+	 fpadd32	$K,@X[$l],%f20
+	srl		$a,27,$tmp1
+	add		$tmp0,$e,$e
+	xor		$c,$b,$tmp0
+	add		$tmp1,$e,$e
+	sll		$b,30,$tmp2
+	xor		$d,$tmp0,$tmp1
+	 std		%f20,[$Xfer+`4*$l`]
+	srl		$b,2,$b
+	add		$tmp1,$e,$e
+	or		$tmp2,$b,$b
+	add		$Xi,$e,$e
+___
+$code.=<<___ if ($i>64);
+	sll		$a,5,$tmp0			!! $i
+	ld		[$Xfer+`4*($i%16)`],$Xi
+	srl		$a,27,$tmp1
+	add		$tmp0,$e,$e
+	xor		$c,$b,$tmp0
+	add		$tmp1,$e,$e
+	sll		$b,30,$tmp2
+	xor		$d,$tmp0,$tmp1
+	srl		$b,2,$b
+	add		$tmp1,$e,$e
+	or		$tmp2,$b,$b
+	add		$Xi,$e,$e
+___
+}
+
+sub BODY_40_59 {
+my ($i,$a,$b,$c,$d,$e)=@_;
+my $j=$i&~1;
+my $k=($j+16+2)%16;	# ahead reference
+my $l=($j+16-2)%16;	# behind reference
+my $K=@VK[($j+16-2)/20];
+
+$j=($j+16)%16;
+
+$code.=<<___ if (!($i&1));
+	sll		$a,5,$tmp0			!! $i
+	ld		[$Xfer+`4*($i%16)`],$Xi
+	 fxors		@X[($j+14)%16],@X[$j+1],@X[$j+1]! 0/ 0/ 0:X[1]^=X[14]
+	srl		$a,27,$tmp1
+	add		$tmp0,$e,$e
+	 fxor		@X[($j+2)%16],@X[($j+8)%16],%f18! 1/ 1/ 1:Tmp=X[2,3]^X[8,9]
+	and		$c,$b,$tmp0
+	add		$tmp1,$e,$e
+	sll		$b,30,$tmp2
+	or		$c,$b,$tmp1
+	 fxor		%f18,@X[$j],@X[$j]		! 2/ 4/ 3:X[0,1]^=X[2,3]^X[8,9]
+	srl		$b,2,$b
+	and		$d,$tmp1,$tmp1
+	add		$Xi,$e,$e
+	or		$tmp1,$tmp0,$tmp1
+	 faligndata	@X[$j],@X[$j],%f18		! 3/ 7/ 5:Tmp=X[0,1]>>>24
+	or		$tmp2,$b,$b
+	add		$tmp1,$e,$e
+	 fpadd32	@X[$j],@X[$j],@X[$j]		! 4/ 8/ 6:X[0,1]<<=1
+___
+$code.=<<___ if ($i&1);
+	sll		$a,5,$tmp0			!! $i
+	ld		[$Xfer+`4*($i%16)`],$Xi
+	srl		$a,27,$tmp1
+	add		$tmp0,$e,$e
+	 fmul8ulx16	%f18,$fmul,%f18			! 5/10/ 7:Tmp>>=7, Tmp&=1
+	and		$c,$b,$tmp0
+	add		$tmp1,$e,$e
+	 fpadd32	$K,@X[$l],%f20			!
+	sll		$b,30,$tmp2
+	or		$c,$b,$tmp1
+	 fxors		@X[($k+13)%16],@X[$k],@X[$k]	!-1/-1/-1:X[0]^=X[13]
+	srl		$b,2,$b
+	and		$d,$tmp1,$tmp1
+	 fxor		%f18,@X[$j],@X[$j]		! 8/14/10:X[0,1]|=Tmp
+	add		$Xi,$e,$e
+	or		$tmp1,$tmp0,$tmp1
+	or		$tmp2,$b,$b
+	add		$tmp1,$e,$e
+	 std		%f20,[$Xfer+`4*$l`]		!
+___
+}
+
+# If there is more data to process, then we pre-fetch the data for
+# next iteration in last ten rounds...
+sub BODY_70_79 {
+my ($i,$a,$b,$c,$d,$e)=@_;
+my $j=$i&~1;
+my $m=($i%8)*2;
+
+$j=($j+16)%16;
+
+$code.=<<___ if ($i==70);
+	sll		$a,5,$tmp0			!! $i
+	ld		[$Xfer+`4*($i%16)`],$Xi
+	srl		$a,27,$tmp1
+	add		$tmp0,$e,$e
+	 ldd		[$inp+64],@X[0]
+	xor		$c,$b,$tmp0
+	add		$tmp1,$e,$e
+	sll		$b,30,$tmp2
+	xor		$d,$tmp0,$tmp1
+	srl		$b,2,$b
+	add		$tmp1,$e,$e
+	or		$tmp2,$b,$b
+	add		$Xi,$e,$e
+
+	and		$inp,-64,$nXfer
+	inc		64,$inp
+	and		$nXfer,255,$nXfer
+	alignaddr	%g0,$align,%g0
+	add		$base,$nXfer,$nXfer
+___
+$code.=<<___ if ($i==71);
+	sll		$a,5,$tmp0			!! $i
+	ld		[$Xfer+`4*($i%16)`],$Xi
+	srl		$a,27,$tmp1
+	add		$tmp0,$e,$e
+	xor		$c,$b,$tmp0
+	add		$tmp1,$e,$e
+	sll		$b,30,$tmp2
+	xor		$d,$tmp0,$tmp1
+	srl		$b,2,$b
+	add		$tmp1,$e,$e
+	or		$tmp2,$b,$b
+	add		$Xi,$e,$e
+___
+$code.=<<___ if ($i>=72);
+	 faligndata	@X[$m],@X[$m+2],@X[$m]
+	sll		$a,5,$tmp0			!! $i
+	ld		[$Xfer+`4*($i%16)`],$Xi
+	srl		$a,27,$tmp1
+	add		$tmp0,$e,$e
+	xor		$c,$b,$tmp0
+	add		$tmp1,$e,$e
+	 fpadd32	$VK_00_19,@X[$m],%f20
+	sll		$b,30,$tmp2
+	xor		$d,$tmp0,$tmp1
+	srl		$b,2,$b
+	add		$tmp1,$e,$e
+	or		$tmp2,$b,$b
+	add		$Xi,$e,$e
+___
+$code.=<<___ if ($i<77);
+	 ldd		[$inp+`8*($i+1-70)`],@X[2*($i+1-70)]
+___
+$code.=<<___ if ($i==77);	# redundant if $inp was aligned
+	 add		$align,63,$tmp0
+	 and		$tmp0,-8,$tmp0
+	 ldd		[$inp+$tmp0],@X[16]
+___
+$code.=<<___ if ($i>=72);
+	 std		%f20,[$nXfer+`4*$m`]
+___
+}
+
+$code.=<<___;
+.section	".text",#alloc,#execinstr
+
+.align	64
+vis_const:
+.long	0x5a827999,0x5a827999	! K_00_19
+.long	0x6ed9eba1,0x6ed9eba1	! K_20_39
+.long	0x8f1bbcdc,0x8f1bbcdc	! K_40_59
+.long	0xca62c1d6,0xca62c1d6	! K_60_79
+.long	0x00000100,0x00000100
+.align	64
+.type	vis_const,#object
+.size	vis_const,(.-vis_const)
+
+.globl	sha1_block_data_order
+sha1_block_data_order:
+	save	%sp,-$frame,%sp
+	add	%fp,$bias-256,$base
+
+1:	call	.+8
+	add	%o7,vis_const-1b,$tmp0
+
+	ldd	[$tmp0+0],$VK_00_19
+	ldd	[$tmp0+8],$VK_20_39
+	ldd	[$tmp0+16],$VK_40_59
+	ldd	[$tmp0+24],$VK_60_79
+	ldd	[$tmp0+32],$fmul
+
+	ld	[$ctx+0],$Actx
+	and	$base,-256,$base
+	ld	[$ctx+4],$Bctx
+	sub	$base,$bias+$frame,%sp
+	ld	[$ctx+8],$Cctx
+	and	$inp,7,$align
+	ld	[$ctx+12],$Dctx
+	and	$inp,-8,$inp
+	ld	[$ctx+16],$Ectx
+
+	! X[16] is maintained in FP register bank
+	alignaddr	%g0,$align,%g0
+	ldd		[$inp+0],@X[0]
+	sub		$inp,-64,$Xfer
+	ldd		[$inp+8],@X[2]
+	and		$Xfer,-64,$Xfer
+	ldd		[$inp+16],@X[4]
+	and		$Xfer,255,$Xfer
+	ldd		[$inp+24],@X[6]
+	add		$base,$Xfer,$Xfer
+	ldd		[$inp+32],@X[8]
+	ldd		[$inp+40],@X[10]
+	ldd		[$inp+48],@X[12]
+	brz,pt		$align,.Laligned
+	ldd		[$inp+56],@X[14]
+
+	ldd		[$inp+64],@X[16]
+	faligndata	@X[0],@X[2],@X[0]
+	faligndata	@X[2],@X[4],@X[2]
+	faligndata	@X[4],@X[6],@X[4]
+	faligndata	@X[6],@X[8],@X[6]
+	faligndata	@X[8],@X[10],@X[8]
+	faligndata	@X[10],@X[12],@X[10]
+	faligndata	@X[12],@X[14],@X[12]
+	faligndata	@X[14],@X[16],@X[14]
+
+.Laligned:
+	mov		5,$tmp0
+	dec		1,$len
+	alignaddr	%g0,$tmp0,%g0
+	fpadd32		$VK_00_19,@X[0],%f16
+	fpadd32		$VK_00_19,@X[2],%f18
+	fpadd32		$VK_00_19,@X[4],%f20
+	fpadd32		$VK_00_19,@X[6],%f22
+	fpadd32		$VK_00_19,@X[8],%f24
+	fpadd32		$VK_00_19,@X[10],%f26
+	fpadd32		$VK_00_19,@X[12],%f28
+	fpadd32		$VK_00_19,@X[14],%f30
+	std		%f16,[$Xfer+0]
+	mov		$Actx,$A
+	std		%f18,[$Xfer+8]
+	mov		$Bctx,$B
+	std		%f20,[$Xfer+16]
+	mov		$Cctx,$C
+	std		%f22,[$Xfer+24]
+	mov		$Dctx,$D
+	std		%f24,[$Xfer+32]
+	mov		$Ectx,$E
+	std		%f26,[$Xfer+40]
+	fxors		@X[13],@X[0],@X[0]
+	std		%f28,[$Xfer+48]
+	ba		.Loop
+	std		%f30,[$Xfer+56]
+.align	32
+.Loop:
+___
+for ($i=0;$i<20;$i++)	{ &BODY_00_19($i,@V); unshift(@V,pop(@V)); }
+for (;$i<40;$i++)	{ &BODY_20_39($i,@V); unshift(@V,pop(@V)); }
+for (;$i<60;$i++)	{ &BODY_40_59($i,@V); unshift(@V,pop(@V)); }
+for (;$i<70;$i++)	{ &BODY_20_39($i,@V); unshift(@V,pop(@V)); }
+$code.=<<___;
+	tst		$len
+	bz,pn		`$bits==32?"%icc":"%xcc"`,.Ltail
+	nop
+___
+for (;$i<80;$i++)	{ &BODY_70_79($i,@V); unshift(@V,pop(@V)); }
+$code.=<<___;
+	add		$A,$Actx,$Actx
+	add		$B,$Bctx,$Bctx
+	add		$C,$Cctx,$Cctx
+	add		$D,$Dctx,$Dctx
+	add		$E,$Ectx,$Ectx
+	mov		5,$tmp0
+	fxors		@X[13],@X[0],@X[0]
+	mov		$Actx,$A
+	mov		$Bctx,$B
+	mov		$Cctx,$C
+	mov		$Dctx,$D
+	mov		$Ectx,$E
+	alignaddr	%g0,$tmp0,%g0	
+	dec		1,$len
+	ba		.Loop
+	mov		$nXfer,$Xfer
+
+.align	32
+.Ltail:
+___
+for($i=70;$i<80;$i++)	{ &BODY_20_39($i,@V); unshift(@V,pop(@V)); }
+$code.=<<___;
+	add	$A,$Actx,$Actx
+	add	$B,$Bctx,$Bctx
+	add	$C,$Cctx,$Cctx
+	add	$D,$Dctx,$Dctx
+	add	$E,$Ectx,$Ectx
+
+	st	$Actx,[$ctx+0]
+	st	$Bctx,[$ctx+4]
+	st	$Cctx,[$ctx+8]
+	st	$Dctx,[$ctx+12]
+	st	$Ectx,[$ctx+16]
+
+	ret
+	restore
+.type	sha1_block_data_order,#function
+.size	sha1_block_data_order,(.-sha1_block_data_order)
+.asciz	"SHA1 block transform for SPARCv9a, CRYPTOGAMS by <appro\@openssl.org>"
+.align	4
+___
+
+# Purpose of these subroutines is to explicitly encode VIS instructions,
+# so that one can compile the module without having to specify VIS
+# extentions on compiler command line, e.g. -xarch=v9 vs. -xarch=v9a.
+# Idea is to reserve for option to produce "universal" binary and let
+# programmer detect if current CPU is VIS capable at run-time.
+sub unvis {
+my ($mnemonic,$rs1,$rs2,$rd)=@_;
+my $ref,$opf;
+my %visopf = (	"fmul8ulx16"	=> 0x037,
+		"faligndata"	=> 0x048,
+		"fpadd32"	=> 0x052,
+		"fxor"		=> 0x06c,
+		"fxors"		=> 0x06d	);
+
+    $ref = "$mnemonic\t$rs1,$rs2,$rd";
+
+    if ($opf=$visopf{$mnemonic}) {
+	foreach ($rs1,$rs2,$rd) {
+	    return $ref if (!/%f([0-9]{1,2})/);
+	    $_=$1;
+	    if ($1>=32) {
+		return $ref if ($1&1);
+		# re-encode for upper double register addressing
+		$_=($1|$1>>5)&31;
+	    }
+	}
+
+	return	sprintf ".word\t0x%08x !%s",
+			0x81b00000|$rd<<25|$rs1<<14|$opf<<5|$rs2,
+			$ref;
+    } else {
+	return $ref;
+    }
+}
+sub unalignaddr {
+my ($mnemonic,$rs1,$rs2,$rd)=@_;
+my %bias = ( "g" => 0, "o" => 8, "l" => 16, "i" => 24 );
+my $ref="$mnemonic\t$rs1,$rs2,$rd";
+
+    foreach ($rs1,$rs2,$rd) {
+	if (/%([goli])([0-7])/)	{ $_=$bias{$1}+$2; }
+	else			{ return $ref; }
+    }
+    return  sprintf ".word\t0x%08x !%s",
+		    0x81b00300|$rd<<25|$rs1<<14|$rs2,
+		    $ref;
+}
+
+$code =~ s/\`([^\`]*)\`/eval $1/gem;
+$code =~ s/\b(f[^\s]*)\s+(%f[0-9]{1,2}),(%f[0-9]{1,2}),(%f[0-9]{1,2})/
+		&unvis($1,$2,$3,$4)
+	  /gem;
+$code =~ s/\b(alignaddr)\s+(%[goli][0-7]),(%[goli][0-7]),(%[goli][0-7])/
+		&unalignaddr($1,$2,$3,$4)
+	  /gem;
+print $code;
+close STDOUT;