summaryrefslogtreecommitdiff
path: root/app/openssl/crypto/des/times/usparc.cc
diff options
context:
space:
mode:
authorParménides GV <parmegv@sdf.org>2014-04-09 16:03:55 +0200
committerParménides GV <parmegv@sdf.org>2014-04-09 16:07:34 +0200
commit1684c8f398922065a97e7da4dac4ac6a33cc5218 (patch)
tree76a4b11ae0d7b217c088f3c2b8fc7e69a7b8ae0d /app/openssl/crypto/des/times/usparc.cc
parentb9a2b085a8f508cd09e2639c70be845c992c4a3e (diff)
Back to the standard "app" module.
This return to "app" instead of "bitmask_android" is due to this reading: https://developer.android.com/sdk/installing/studio-build.html#projectStructure I'll have to tweak the final apk name in build.gradle.
Diffstat (limited to 'app/openssl/crypto/des/times/usparc.cc')
-rw-r--r--app/openssl/crypto/des/times/usparc.cc31
1 files changed, 31 insertions, 0 deletions
diff --git a/app/openssl/crypto/des/times/usparc.cc b/app/openssl/crypto/des/times/usparc.cc
new file mode 100644
index 00000000..0864285e
--- /dev/null
+++ b/app/openssl/crypto/des/times/usparc.cc
@@ -0,0 +1,31 @@
+solaris 2.5.1 usparc 167mhz?? - SC4.0 cc -fast -Xa -xO5
+
+For the ultra sparc, SunC 4.0 cc -fast -Xa -xO5, running 'des_opts'
+gives a speed of 475,000 des/s while 'speed' gives 417,000 des/s.
+I believe the difference is tied up in optimisation that the compiler
+is able to perform when the code is 'inlined'. For 'speed', the DES
+routines are being linked from a library. I'll record the higher
+speed since if performance is everything, you can always inline
+'des_enc.c'.
+
+[ 16-Jan-06 - I've been playing with the
+ '-xtarget=ultra -xarch=v8plus -Xa -xO5 -Xa'
+ and while it makes the des_opts numbers much slower, it makes the
+ actual 'speed' numbers look better which is a realistic version of
+ using the libraries. ]
+
+options des ecb/s
+16 r1 p 475516.90 100.0%
+16 r2 p 439388.10 92.4%
+16 c i 427001.40 89.8%
+16 c p 419516.50 88.2%
+ 4 r2 p 409491.70 86.1%
+ 4 r1 p 404266.90 85.0%
+ 4 c p 398121.00 83.7%
+ 4 c i 370588.40 77.9%
+ 4 r1 i 362742.20 76.3%
+16 r2 i 331275.50 69.7%
+16 r1 i 324730.60 68.3%
+ 4 r2 i 63535.10 13.4% <-- very very weird, must be cache problems.
+-DDES_UNROLL -DDES_RISC1 -DDES_PTR
+