Age | Commit message (Collapse) | Author |
|
The offline toggle added a race condition in which the client could end
up offline forever. We decided to remove it for now and then decide if
soledad client needs to know about network connectivity (check:
https://0xacab.org/leap/soledad/issues/8789).
|
|
|
|
- Resolves: #8721
|
|
Check if a new fetched key was signed by a old key with the same address.
Please do not merge before: https://github.com/isislovecruft/python-gnupg/pull/150
- Resolves #8112
|
|
|
|
the token is set when we get the srp token in the keymanager service,
but it wasn't been propagated properly to the internal nicknym object
that was refactored recently.
here I make the setter write the same token to both keymanager itself
and the nicknym.
some little additional refactors:
- move gpg initialization to a helper method
in this way it becomes easier to stub the soledad and keymanager
components, for testing.
- name nicknym token as publicly visible, since i'm accessing
it from the keymanager object.
- Resolves: #8651
|
|
- some pep8 problems
- some confusion with old and new code after merging
from old keymanager
|
|
disabled some tests that were failing, for some reason the twisted
logger doesn't want to be patched?
besides, I don't think it's a good idea to rely on log information for
tests. what is it really that we were trying to test there?
|
|
|
|
Port of the original commit:
8f1fe8dd4a54fd2bdda2fc78c339ce9b3d0fc331
by Zara Gebru that introduced updating keys in the background.
This was made in the legacy leapcode/keymanager repo, but was lost in
the merge to the unified bitmask-dev.
Original commit message follows:
--------------------------------
- refresh random key in random time
- add get key by fingerprint
- refactor nicknym methods to own file
- tests
- note this do not include a check for
revoked key, since that need some changes
in gnupg
- Related: #6089
|
|
|
|
currently windows 7 support is broken with gnupg.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
this brings back a couple of commits by pixelated that were missed in my
keymanager merge.
https://github.com/leapcode/keymanager/commit/354ad5a12e90463f9952fe056f191c6d4cdadf40
https://github.com/leapcode/keymanager/commit/dd7ba606df2909c76b20b1d4bb0134302f94b3d0
basically it removes the destructor (there's no guarantee that it gets
executed!) and it addds the combined ca bundle as an optional parameter
to keymanager initialization
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|