Age | Commit message (Collapse) | Author |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
undocumented because we don't want users messing with the option
|
|
the password option shouldn't appear in the help message though, to
discourage users to use it as if it was a regular cli feature.
|
|
also, move the bash script to automate bundle testing from a gist to
bitmask repo itself.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
- Resolves: #8676
|
|
seems it's only valid for win and mac tho
|
|
my goal here is also to start *real* unit tests for the keymanager, that
do not need an actual soledad implementation. this should make all the
coming tests much faster. I would like to have a common soledad stub
that follows the soledad api, but w/o actual disk persistance, and
migrate all the bulk of the keymanager tests to these unit tests.
|
|
the token is set when we get the srp token in the keymanager service,
but it wasn't been propagated properly to the internal nicknym object
that was refactored recently.
here I make the setter write the same token to both keymanager itself
and the nicknym.
some little additional refactors:
- move gpg initialization to a helper method
in this way it becomes easier to stub the soledad and keymanager
components, for testing.
- name nicknym token as publicly visible, since i'm accessing
it from the keymanager object.
- Resolves: #8651
|
|
the bundle was trying to get the gpg binary from the config folder
instead of the bundled binary.
|
|
- some pep8 problems
- some confusion with old and new code after merging
from old keymanager
|
|
disabled some tests that were failing, for some reason the twisted
logger doesn't want to be patched?
besides, I don't think it's a good idea to rely on log information for
tests. what is it really that we were trying to test there?
|
|
|
|
Port of the original commit:
8f1fe8dd4a54fd2bdda2fc78c339ce9b3d0fc331
by Zara Gebru that introduced updating keys in the background.
This was made in the legacy leapcode/keymanager repo, but was lost in
the merge to the unified bitmask-dev.
Original commit message follows:
--------------------------------
- refresh random key in random time
- add get key by fingerprint
- refactor nicknym methods to own file
- tests
- note this do not include a check for
revoked key, since that need some changes
in gnupg
- Related: #6089
|
|
|
|
this also means that these bundles can only be used against cdev for
now, since we need the latest soledad server.
i'm using my personal devpi repo because the development mode install
breaks the bundles for some reason (namespace probably).
latest version uploaded is: leap-soledad-client-0.9.0+58.g0d9e74e
which is today's shyba state but rebased on top of the 0.9.0 tag.
|
|
this should affect the name in the download dropdown in Gitlab
|
|
I think 1 week should be enough so that we don't clutter the machine too
much. It probably will give trouble when someone goes on vacation, or if
we stall the development of bitmask because we're moving development
towards other fronts, but...
|
|
just the one shipped with the ubuntu image used by the docker container
for now. I have to investigate how to properly use a docker container
only for building the gpg binary.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
otherwise, the call from the rest API hangs forever because the
authentication has not happened and not all the configs have been downloaded.
- Resolves: #8576
|
|
This has been previously encapsulated in a dict, and the commands were
not modified accordingly.
I'm adding some very basic test for the KeymanagerService public api
contract.
- Resolves: #8577
|
|
this reverts the refactoring made at 596f1f8
it seems it is now allowed to call a function that yields from inside as
part of an inline deferred.
|
|
you need to configure onion = True in the services config.
for sure, this is gonna be more interesting when we ship pixelated.
but for now I thought it can be handy for testing ui changes: no need to
bundle, just use your tor browser :)
still need to try to serve imap/smtp over the onion service.
kudos to meejah for this super-usable library!
|
|
some hacks needed, it seems pyinstaller is choking again on namespace
packages for some reason that is beyond my current comprenhension.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|